I am wiling to accept the fact that o2 may be SLIGHTLY narcotic, but no one will every convince me that the narcotic properties are ANYWHERE near that of n2..
WHen the conditions permit, there is a drill I do with my Technical rebreather students.. I bring them to 45m/150 fsw (give or take a bit) using AIR diluent.. we start with a po2 of 1.3... this means we have about 23% o2 in the loop, I have the breath the loop down to somewhere between a .7 and a 1.0 (somewhere between 13-18% 02)..
at this point the PN2 is at least a 4.5 (for a 1.0 po2), All divers report afterwards of high narcosis and skills done at depth show this.... We then quickly raise the po2 to a 1.4- 1.5, this drops the pn2 down to a 4.0-4.1, EVERY diver has reported feeling noticibly clearer headed and skills done under these conditions show drastic improvement
Here's the question I would have with this. Why do people use 30/30 if EAN 30 would do the trick?
When moving from air to EAN 32 oxygen is only displacing 11% of the N2 and in a range where N2 isn't all that debilitating yet. Even with He mixtures is 11% enough to be that noticeable? I assume with He the answer is probably yes but this oxygen not being narcotic subject just doesn't line up very well logically for me given that to test it you are in a range where narcosis isn't a big factor anyway (not referring to your example in this case).
I can't really address your test although on the face of it it's logical enough though highly subjective.
As a practical matter I don't think nitrox reduces narcosis to any substantial degree because narcosis is limited in EAN ranges and because the deeper you go the less O2 in the mix anyway and to say that you won't get "narced" on nitrox is completely wrong no matter how you look at it.
Anxiety and CO2 being large components of most people experiencing being narced this is not reduced in any way by nitrox and the nitrogen in the mix is only being marginally reduced by the oxygen (even if it weren't narcotic at all) there wouldn't be a great effect.