There is normally an option for private education, but there will normally be additional fees involved. If you feel that you can benefit from one on one with the instructor, and you have the extra dough, that may be an option.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
5 Star centers mean nothing in many cases- it doesn't guarantee a quality course
The name alone implies excellence- 5 star hotels, Michelin star restaurants, 5 Star Padi shops. There is a bit more to it than just being a busy dive center but again it doesn't say anything about the teaching ability of its staff.
Which rescue skills are included in NAUI and SEI? PADI has very basic rescue skills like cramp removal and towing and basic information like what to do with unresponsive divers on the surface, a bit about the importance of O2 etc. That's about it. If I have the time, it'd be interesting to include some more skills but given that, It'd be helpful to know what other agencies promote as suitable skills for entry level divers so as not to overload them.
Based on what our instructor told us, the 5 star rating has nothing to do with the quality of training but the type of service the shop provides. I dont remember all details, but one star is given for certified repair, the other for training dive masters, another for mixing air ... I dont remember the other two...
I honestly believe there should be a public database of accidents related to certifications, so if someone has an accident serious enough to warrant an investigation, instructor / shop / diver ID should be recorded and made publicly available. This way you can at least find a relationship between quality of service if you judge it by the final outcome -- an accident free diving.
There is normally an option for private education, but there will normally be additional fees involved. If you feel that you can benefit from one on one with the instructor, and you have the extra dough, that may be an option.
So what do you preferr? A quick course that ignore wether everyone actually learn what they should or one that takes twice as long but make sure everyone learn?
Would you rather just send people on their way with no further education and still a gap in their basic education (which btw may or may not be at the fault of the instructor) or make sure they get the further education and the gap in their former one filled?
I’d like what’s behind door #3 please. That would be take a competency exam, if passed then issue the card take a little money. Why does everything has to be all or nothing? Oh yeah $$$$$$$$$$$!
I’d like what’s behind door #3 please. That would be take a competency exam, if passed then issue the card take a little money. Why does everything has to be all or nothing? Oh yeah $$$$$$$$$$$!
So what do you preferr? A quick course that ignore wether everyone actually learn what they should or one that takes twice as long but make sure everyone learn?
Would you rather just send people on their way with no further education and still a gap in their basic education (which btw may or may not be at the fault of the instructor) or make sure they get the further education and the gap in their former one filled?
At what point did you assume that it'd be cheaper to ask an instructor to take an unknown, untrained diver down at depths, with the goal of deciding what level of risk they pose to themselves and that instructor?