limeyx
Guest
wilbkr1:Hello,
Thank you for all the helpful information and great advice.
@ Limeyx You bring a good point to the table. I am land locked in Indiana. A large portion of my diving is in the lakes and quarries in the midwest. I do 1 exotic dive per year. Last year was Cayman Brac and this year is Bonaire. Maybe the 900 or 950 is a good all round solution. Is HD that much better than SD? Would like to hear the communities thoughts on that.
@ DRbill I bought the back monitor with my TDII just for that very reason. I figured I wouldn't do to well trying to look through a view finder while filming.
Thank you for taking time to help. Have a great day.
Honestly, I am still evaluating how much better my 3CCD HD camera is compared to my single CCD SD camera.
HD still has distribution "issues" (burning HD-DVD or Blu-ray) but apparently even when down-converted to a regular DVD, looks better than an SD camera.
The biggest thing I am learning:
- HD is inherently not as good as SD in lowlight right now
- HD is *really* *really* big (fills my entire 24" LCD screen)
- With HD, I find I need to adjust white balance/manual gain to get a good picture -- I am not sure if the Top Dawg Housing can do that because the LANC protocol does not support it.
I am putting together a short movie where I can mix/match some SD/HD footage -- maybe I can put something up next week.
I am convinced HD is the way forward, and from my perspective, I wont invest any more $ into SD
EDIT: With the LCD on the TDII housing. 99% chance the LCD is 4:3 aspect ration. HD is inherently widescreen which means what you are filming will be a bit outside the LCD (same thing if you put an SD cam into "fake" 16:9 format)
(just an FYI -- this can be irritating as you can get errant fins of buddies on the tape but not on the LCD etc...)