For me it does. I've moved exclusively to doubles with an isolation manifold when diving in cold water. I see that setup alot on Great Lakes wreck diving charters, even amongst those diving recreational depths/bottom times.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Shall we take this hijack to: Should all divers have a redundant air source on every dive?Id suggest all divers should have an a redundant air source adequate to get them to the surface on EVERY dive.
Given the increased probability of a regulator failure in very cold water and the fact that ice may complicate your ascent and the reality that having two divers breathing off a single first state will greatly increase the likelihood of free flow ... would it be prudent to dive with a fully redundant regulator, (e.g., isolated doubles, independent doubles, pony, etc.)?
I don't see how it could have any significant disadvantages - certainly not enough to outweigh the advantages.Given the increased probability of a regulator failure in very cold water and the fact that ice may complicate your ascent and the reality that having two divers breathing off a single first state will greatly increase the likelihood of free flow ... would it be prudent to dive with a fully redundant regulator, (e.g., isolated doubles, independent doubles, pony, etc.)?