Is this really REQUIRED? I will not be very deep >150fsw or very cold +60° Worst case assuming 2x steel 100s 20# 2 regulators, bands and manifold ~7# 3mm wetsuit -6# (or 6mm @ 12#) so a total of about 21# (no weight belt). I know that I can easily swim up 17# probably more but have not tried yet. worst case is about 27# with total wetsuit compression.
so assuming I jump off the back of a boat and my primary bladder pops or the dump valve disintegrates on impact, I would need to stop my decent relatively quickly or take a trip to the bottom. Seems to me if put about 4-6# permanent positive buoyancy on my kit that I could just swim up in the event of a total wing failure. and then deploy an SMB or lift bag at the surface? Is this sort of plan sufficient? I could of course just go to the bottom complete my dive and then be neutral for the swim up. an alternate plan might be to put my singles wing (32#) in tandem and orally inflate in an emergency. means additional drag and an additional hose.
would tech instructors permit me to dive this configuration? (assuming I could demonstrate the ability to swim up my kit with 0 air in the wing?) and also had neutral buoyancy at the safety stop?
so assuming I jump off the back of a boat and my primary bladder pops or the dump valve disintegrates on impact, I would need to stop my decent relatively quickly or take a trip to the bottom. Seems to me if put about 4-6# permanent positive buoyancy on my kit that I could just swim up in the event of a total wing failure. and then deploy an SMB or lift bag at the surface? Is this sort of plan sufficient? I could of course just go to the bottom complete my dive and then be neutral for the swim up. an alternate plan might be to put my singles wing (32#) in tandem and orally inflate in an emergency. means additional drag and an additional hose.
would tech instructors permit me to dive this configuration? (assuming I could demonstrate the ability to swim up my kit with 0 air in the wing?) and also had neutral buoyancy at the safety stop?