Stoo
Contributor
- Messages
- 3,505
- Reaction score
- 3,804
- # of dives
- 5000 - ∞
I'm not sure I agree that SC cards are the best choice for "storage"... although I do agree that taking some spares is a good idea. Even good cards are an expensive alternative. For example, up here in Canada, retail price on a 32 GB "Extreme" card is almost $50. You can buy a TB Seagate drive for under $100, so the cost per GB is a fraction of SD cards. (And you should buy high speed cards... that little camera will generate a large file if you shoot Raw... probably close to 20 MB each... If you are banging off a quick series of shots, a fast write time to the card really helps..)
The reason that I, and others, suggest taking spare cards, is that they are notoriously unreliable... They're probably the weakest link in your system.
If you really don't want to take a laptop, then your solution of having a gizmo that can copy cards to a drive, that's great. The unit you mentioned is, I think, just a card reader... I don't know it will allow you to copy files to a remote drive... All it's doing is connecting two "dumb" devices together. To actually get those two devices (the card and the drive) to do something, I think you need to stick a computer in between...
It might be that you could add a simple little Netbook or something to do this...
Speaking to my own experience, the "picture taking" is the reason I go on the trip. I shoot to cards (I have two on board my D7000, one backing up the other), copy to a Macbook, then back the Mac up to a remote drive, daily. When I'm flying, I don't keep the drive and the Mac together... A bit paranoid, but if I am dropping $6 - $10K on a trip for Mrs. Stoo and I, I really want my pics to survive. I've been around computers long enough to know that they only fail when you really need them... Like when you're on a boat in the middle of the Red Sea for example...
I also agree that having a laptop with some software on it is a REALLY useful tool to improve your photography. Being able to review your daily shooting is invaluable. When you consider all of the cr*p you need to take on a dive trip, sticking a 13" laptop into your carry-on isn't much additional load.
No matter what you decide, have a great trip, and shoot LOTS!
The reason that I, and others, suggest taking spare cards, is that they are notoriously unreliable... They're probably the weakest link in your system.
If you really don't want to take a laptop, then your solution of having a gizmo that can copy cards to a drive, that's great. The unit you mentioned is, I think, just a card reader... I don't know it will allow you to copy files to a remote drive... All it's doing is connecting two "dumb" devices together. To actually get those two devices (the card and the drive) to do something, I think you need to stick a computer in between...
It might be that you could add a simple little Netbook or something to do this...
Speaking to my own experience, the "picture taking" is the reason I go on the trip. I shoot to cards (I have two on board my D7000, one backing up the other), copy to a Macbook, then back the Mac up to a remote drive, daily. When I'm flying, I don't keep the drive and the Mac together... A bit paranoid, but if I am dropping $6 - $10K on a trip for Mrs. Stoo and I, I really want my pics to survive. I've been around computers long enough to know that they only fail when you really need them... Like when you're on a boat in the middle of the Red Sea for example...
I also agree that having a laptop with some software on it is a REALLY useful tool to improve your photography. Being able to review your daily shooting is invaluable. When you consider all of the cr*p you need to take on a dive trip, sticking a 13" laptop into your carry-on isn't much additional load.
No matter what you decide, have a great trip, and shoot LOTS!