TheNitroxinator
Contributor
On short notice, I wound up getting the Nikon CP3 housing so I'd have a backup for my 5050 in PNG. I handed the 5600 off to a buddy for a couple of dives. He used the underwater mode, and usually had the internal strobe on. No dice, its still blue on his photos unless he got really close. Unless you happen to dive in conditions that match what Nikon chose for their underwater white balance, I think you're better off using the manual white balance.
Would I buy the Fantasea? That's what I'll be recommending to one student with a 5200, assuming she chooses to get a housing of any sort. She'll be using my 5600 for a National Geographic exploration dive. I'll need to demonstrate the manual white balance, and turning the strobe on and off to avoid backscatter. The lack of shutter and aperture control is annoying, but in good light the automatic settings do a decent job with manual white balance. I expect that students are going to buy a housing for digital cameras that they already have in most cases, and most students will have something with a bunch of scene modes and no manual shutter and aperture settings. The Nikons match that. Maybe Nikon will match the Canon A520 and put full manual control in their low end consumer cameras someday, but its apparently not going to happen with this years models. Incidentally, I've been using the Canon A520 lately, just because of the manual controls, and the housing isn't much bigger than the Nikon CP3. I do think the Nikon is better for macro, but most beginners don't really have the knack for macro shots anyway, time will tell which one they'd prefer to use.
I'd go with the Fantasea housing if I had time to get a delivery - its basically setup to do the manual white balance without a problem, based on finally getting to see a housing firsthand (that only required my being in a camera store in Australia,, while living in So. Cal). I don't actually use any of the missing buttons from my Nikon housing, they just get in the way. My Nikon housing hasn't leaked yet, but I don't know that it will really be any better than the Fantasea, and the Fantasea costs a lot less. Fantasea will soon have a new strobe housing for the coolflash, or there's the Sunpak as a low cost alternative. I'm seriously considering getting one in lieue of the internal strobe, that might eliminate the shutter speed issues for some of the nearer shots, and not introduce a bunch of backscatter.
Examples? Well, I attached a couple showing what you can get with manual white balance and some post processing. Not as good as what I can get with a good strobe, 5050, assorted add on lenses, and manual shutter and aperture control, but probably good enough for what most beginners would be looking to get.
Would I buy the Fantasea? That's what I'll be recommending to one student with a 5200, assuming she chooses to get a housing of any sort. She'll be using my 5600 for a National Geographic exploration dive. I'll need to demonstrate the manual white balance, and turning the strobe on and off to avoid backscatter. The lack of shutter and aperture control is annoying, but in good light the automatic settings do a decent job with manual white balance. I expect that students are going to buy a housing for digital cameras that they already have in most cases, and most students will have something with a bunch of scene modes and no manual shutter and aperture settings. The Nikons match that. Maybe Nikon will match the Canon A520 and put full manual control in their low end consumer cameras someday, but its apparently not going to happen with this years models. Incidentally, I've been using the Canon A520 lately, just because of the manual controls, and the housing isn't much bigger than the Nikon CP3. I do think the Nikon is better for macro, but most beginners don't really have the knack for macro shots anyway, time will tell which one they'd prefer to use.
I'd go with the Fantasea housing if I had time to get a delivery - its basically setup to do the manual white balance without a problem, based on finally getting to see a housing firsthand (that only required my being in a camera store in Australia,, while living in So. Cal). I don't actually use any of the missing buttons from my Nikon housing, they just get in the way. My Nikon housing hasn't leaked yet, but I don't know that it will really be any better than the Fantasea, and the Fantasea costs a lot less. Fantasea will soon have a new strobe housing for the coolflash, or there's the Sunpak as a low cost alternative. I'm seriously considering getting one in lieue of the internal strobe, that might eliminate the shutter speed issues for some of the nearer shots, and not introduce a bunch of backscatter.
Examples? Well, I attached a couple showing what you can get with manual white balance and some post processing. Not as good as what I can get with a good strobe, 5050, assorted add on lenses, and manual shutter and aperture control, but probably good enough for what most beginners would be looking to get.