Not understanding the short hose thing

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Maybe you should read how the new 50/50 theory works, then you won't be so quick to judge.

http://www.scubaboard.com/forums/whine-cheeze/315900-its-your-fault.html


I am not going to wade through so many pages of this :shakehead:.

If Captain's tank valve O ring has a 50/50 chance of failure that would not jive with reality in any form or fashion since the chance of failure is significantly less than 50/50.

But, I know you are joking around, :rofl3:.

I do not agree with the 50/50 proposal, it is incorrect and statistically invalid, sorry.

N
 
I am not going to wade through so many pages of this :shakehead:.

If Captain's tank valve O ring has a 50/50 chance of failure that would not jive with reality in any form or fashion since the chance of failure is significantly less than 50/50.

But, I know you are joking around, :rofl3:.

I do not agree with the 50/50 proposal, it is incorrect and statistically invalid, sorry.

N

That's his point, and yes they are being sarcastic. That whole thread, except for the first post, is about the idiocy of the OPs 50/50 proposal.
 
Bad joke about the thread title I linked to (Not understanding the "whole thing").
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/teric/

Back
Top Bottom