Opinions please....

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Levigarrett

Registered
Messages
67
Reaction score
8
Location
Florida
# of dives
100 - 199
Would you be willing to dive doubles (Steel lp85's) with only a single bladder 60# wing and a wetsuit?

In this case, I'll also have a 50# liftbag and at least two possibly three additional more experienced divers.

I was recently told that absent a redundant bladder or drysuit, this gear configuration is a no-go for an AN/DP course. This makes perfect sense to me, I'm not arguing against this line of thinking but wondering if such thinking is wide spread?

I ask because the Halcyon wing in question is available to me at a significantly reduced cost.

Opinions please. Thanks.
 
No. You need to research the concept of "balanced rig". Also, that wing is too wide for those tanks. A 40lb wing is more like it, and a drysuit.
 
For LP85's yes I would and do. With a 5mil and for my double 72's I use a 3 mil. And always carry a 50 lb min lift bag for redundant buoyancy. What you will use in class however is up to your instructor and what they will allow. If he won't allow it ask him to loan you a wing. Or find another instructor. BTW I use a 58lb HOG wing with mine. I'll be buying a 38 though for the 72's soon as the funds are freed up.
 
Would I now? Not without a drysuit. Have I in the past? Yes. My doubles wing is 55# and I use it for any doubles setup from AL80s to HP130s, because it is what I own. If I am diving steel, however, I use a drysuit. I rarely need much air in my wing with LP85s and a light undergarment.
 
I would dive that configuration as long as i had a 50lb lift bag. That having been said, I greatly prefer using the drysuit for diving with doubles...
 
Ok, thanks for the replies. It's actually a 55# wing. I have absolutely no intention of buying a drysuit or diving one. I live in Florida and the vast majority of my diving is done without even a wetsuit. On the rare occasions when one is needed, I have a 3 mil suit that has thus far been more than enough. If it's colder than the average spring, I'm not interested. I have other hobbies for those days.

The 85's are not mine. I would not personally invest in doubles of that size. They are however being loaned to me to use whenever I like so for now, I'm quite happy to have access to them. Once I'm finished with this course and I have a better grasp of my own consumption, I'll look to purchase doubles. I suspect I'll be looking for something quite a bit larger than 85's.
 
Once I'm finished with this course and I have a better grasp of my own consumption, I'll look to purchase doubles. I suspect I'll be looking for something quite a bit larger than 85's.
In which case a dry suit will make a lot of sense.

I am a Colorado resident, but I spent a quite interesting 1.5 months in Florida this past spring. I did some caves near High Springs, and everyone I saw diving there was in a dry suit. I did a lot of deep decompression dives in the Pompano area, and I was the only one diving a dry suit. The water temperatures were nearly the same--the ocean was a little colder.

The cave divers would not think of going into the caves at 71° without a dry suit. The ocean divers would not think of using anything but a wet suit. On several of the ocean dives my wet suited buddy was visibly shivering during the final decompression. I was wearing my light underwear under my dry suit and was perfectly comfortable. He was also cold during the deeper parts of some of the dives, and I was always fine. But he would not dream of buying a dry suit.

So, I see two totally different attitudes in Florida. I am frankly having a little trouble understanding the difference in thought.
 
In which case a dry suit will make a lot of sense.

I am a Colorado resident, but I spent a quite interesting 1.5 months in Florida this past spring. I did some caves near High Springs, and everyone I saw diving there was in a dry suit. I did a lot of deep decompression dives in the Pompano area, and I was the only one diving a dry suit. The water temperatures were nearly the same--the ocean was a little colder.

The cave divers would not think of going into the caves at 71° without a dry suit. The ocean divers would not think of using anything but a wet suit. On several of the ocean dives my wet suited buddy was visibly shivering during the final decompression. I was wearing my light underwear under my dry suit and was perfectly comfortable. He was also cold during the deeper parts of some of the dives, and I was always fine. But he would not dream of buying a dry suit.

So, I see two totally different attitudes in Florida. I am frankly having a little trouble understanding the difference in thought.

I certainly can't speak to the "attitudes" of other divers and why they've selected their gear configurations. For me, simply, if I believe that exposure is going to be a serious concern because of cold water temps, I'd probably find something else to do that day. I've worn both a 5 and 7 mil suit and that has thus far, always been sufficient. A dry suit is a significant investment that I don't predict I'll need often enough to make it's purchase reasonable. I don't enjoy cold water, so I avoid it.

I enjoy diving, but I have plenty of other interest if the conditions are not going to suit me. Additionally, I the winter, I'm quite happy to drive far enough south where a 5 or 7 mil suit will comfortably suffice. Plenty of my avid scuba buddies disagree. Their leisure activity is exclusively scuba and for them, they're not going to be deterred by cold water, I'm not one of those people.
 
Last edited:
No, I wouldn't.

....and once you've done the AN/DP courses...and seen how your skills/competence match up against the requirement.... I doubt you will too. :wink:

Coming up with a lift bag is a serious skill set. You'll be struggling to do it as it is, let alone with a bag. And you certainly won't/shouldn't be ending a tech course thinking that it'd be okay to rely on your buddy to get you out of the fire.
 
I acquired HP117cft doubles and a Zeagle SSBP/Wg (65lbs) last year as well as a drysuit Fusion). When I took my AN DP course this past spring my instructor recommended that I either consider switching my wing to a dual bladder system or add an additional Wg to the set-up which I did.

The last thing I wanted was to put all my faith into a drysuit zipper to hold me, my set-up plus two stage bottles in case of a main wing failure. We also discuss the use of a 50 lbs lift bag as a contingency measure. His answer was how comfortable and proficient was I to shoot a lift bag under ideal conditions, let alone having to do it unprepared as you are tumbling (maybe an exageration here) toward the dark and nebulous depth of your body of water and then having to unstow the darn thing, connect it to a reel of some sort and then shoot it up and then do damage control as to the impact of this mishap to your profile and related deco schedule.

This year for the first time I dove my steel tanks locally wearing only my 7mm. However, I did so with a set-up consisting of two independent bladders mounted on my BP.

Now if your instructor wants to see an extra bladder or a drysuit as a contingency buoyancy device, you may have very little choice. The alternative will be to find an instructor who is willing to teach you in your present configuration...which I think would be contravening the course standards of most agencies I am aware of.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/peregrine/
http://cavediveflorida.com/Rum_House.htm

Back
Top Bottom