TsandM "A safety stop may safely be omitted on almost all dives (except the ones with a "mandatory" safety stop, and how that's different from a decompression stop is something which has NEVER been clear to me)"
As you said, TSANDM, safety stops are just there for what you said: add some security to the whole thing. A deco stop is, of course, when you have gone past the NDL ( no deco limit ).
As I am sure you know, there are "safety" margins taken by all tables and computors. My computor is set on a "safety" margin of 20% on both saturation and desaturation from the Bühlmann (GH 16 ) model. So a Decostop mandated by my computor, may be considered as an additional safety measure for a more agressive diver.
Since we are working with a very large variety of divers, all tables are significant only on a statistical level. So the barrier between "safety" stop and "mandatory" stop is more a question of semantics than reality.
The only thing that one has to know is that most computors will accept omission of a safety stop, while they will "block" themselves for 48 hours if you miss a decostop
As you said, TSANDM, safety stops are just there for what you said: add some security to the whole thing. A deco stop is, of course, when you have gone past the NDL ( no deco limit ).
As I am sure you know, there are "safety" margins taken by all tables and computors. My computor is set on a "safety" margin of 20% on both saturation and desaturation from the Bühlmann (GH 16 ) model. So a Decostop mandated by my computor, may be considered as an additional safety measure for a more agressive diver.
Since we are working with a very large variety of divers, all tables are significant only on a statistical level. So the barrier between "safety" stop and "mandatory" stop is more a question of semantics than reality.
The only thing that one has to know is that most computors will accept omission of a safety stop, while they will "block" themselves for 48 hours if you miss a decostop