cool_hardware52
Contributor
H2Andy:This is going to be a volatile subject, so please NO PERSONAL ATTACKS allowed. address issues and ideas, not people. if you call anyone a name, your post will be pulled, no questions asked.
As to the ideas themselves, please speak freely.
---------------------------------------------------------
We often hear "let's police ourselves before the government steps in."
What if "self-policing" has failed? The training standards
are compromised, some might argue, new divers are at
their unsafest level ever, more and more instructors are
teaching without a basic understanding themselves.
Only a government entity (immune from commercial pressures) can ensure that standards are not only SET IN PAPER but
also ADHERED to in training.
Pilots have to pass an FAA test, though their training can be
private. Why not the same for divers?
Wouldn't divers be safer if someone WITHOUT A PROFIT MOTIVE was in charge of evaluating diver skills prior to
handing them a license?
Hey Andy,
Interesting question.
First how do you define failure? Deaths or injuries per 1000 participants or some similar metric?
The analogy to pilots is flawed. Pilots have a real chance to hurt people other than themselves. Same for Doctors and enginners for that matter.
Do private CFI's have a lesser profit motive than a Dive instructor in terms of selling more training or recruiting more students?
Has the FAA prevented stupid unsafe behavior by pilots? To a fair degree in commercial aviation, yes. General aviation is over represented by risk taking cowboys, dare I say many of the same personalities not uncommon in scuba. Please understand most pilots are safe (or really want to be) as are most divers, but the cowboy element exists in both pursuits.
How would define success?
Regards,
Tobin George