Practices that could lead to accidents on training dives

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Jim Lapenta

Contributor
Scuba Instructor
Divemaster
Messages
18,090
Reaction score
11,588
Location
Canonsburg, Pa
# of dives
1000 - 2499
In another thread I stated that I would be posting about this. What got me on this track was the weekend I just spent with a student working on his SEI Master Diver certification. We initially planned to spend the weekend just working on his dives for the course. What happened however turned the weekend into a learning experience on how to identify problems with Open Water instruction and identify possible dive accidents waiting to happen.

It is no secret about how I feel concerning abbreviated courses. What I saw this weekend only reinforced those opinions and in one instance had me sure that we were going to see a serious incident. By the grace of whatever deity there may be, this did not happen. Or only by pure dumb luck it didn’t. What I am referring to in this instance is the incident that happened on Saturday morning during our first dive of the day. We were in the water early as we knew that it was going to get crowded fast. Big groups of OW students were coming in and the vis was going to get trashed fairly soon. About halfway through the dive we had just practiced a swim thru of a school bus and had circled around to see a group of 6 OW students with an instructor and a DM bringing up the rear. Vis was now getting reduced to around 20 feet and the group was coming thru single file. After what happened in the Rawlings incident it occurred to me that these people must not have heard of it. How any conscientious instructor could or would risk taking a group of 6 students around single file is beyond me if they had heard of it. No one was buddied up, students were bouncing like a line of yoyo’s with very poor buoyancy skills and the vis was such that the ends of the line could not see each other.

It was the last that was most disconcerting as my student and I watched a young lady at the back of the line start to lose control and ascend somewhat rapidly. Luckily the DM was there to catch her by the fin and stop her near runaway ascent. What was unlucky for her was the way in which he did it. He grabbed her fin, then her ankle, then worked his way up to her tank valve and literally shoved her down about ten feet to the bottom. As he was doing this she had her inflator in her left hand and with her right appeared to struggling to equalize. At no time did the DM make eye contact with her. She was kicking trying to maintain some depth and only when she happened to turn to see what had a hold of her did she seem to relax some. He then was pulling her along by the tank valve trying to catch up with the rest of the group that was now out of sight. The instructor never came back to see if anything was wrong. There was no way he was aware of what was happening at the back of HIS GROUP OF STUDENTS and the DM was in no position to assist the student directly in front of the girl with the problem. Given the time of day I would surmise that it was the first dive of the day and in some systems this is supposed to be a short tour after assessing the student’s comfort level. Why you would take someone on a tour with such poor control is beyond me. Why they would not still be in the pool is beyond me.

The event that I just described could have resulted in a few things. First had the DM not caught the girl she could have been hurt in a runaway ascent. Second she could have suffered a serious barotrauma from being drug down by the DM and not been able to effectively equalize. A ruptured eardrum in 65 degree water could have resulted in severe vertigo and outright panic. At the same time this incident could have taken the attention away from another student who may have stopped to see where the DM was, lost sight of the group, went to look for the DM or group, got separated, panicked, and had his own serious injury. And no one would have known. Because no one was buddied up. What this instructor did was tell every one of those students that any talk about the buddy system was BS. And he did on their first OW dive.

Another cause could have been equipment related. What led me to this thought was what I saw on the surface. Between 4 different groups of students I counted 22 new divers and not one octo holder or method to clip off their spg console among them. I saw new divers and a couple of instructors splash with octos hanging behind them, down at their sides, and a few trapped on the left side of the tank. Gauges were likewise dangling and swinging wildly as they jumped in. I saw two octos and one console bounce off the dock as divers entered just a bit close. Not once did an instructor say anything to any student about securing their gauges. I also saw no buddy checks being done. Had I been able to positively identify the shop or instructor I would have said something to someone with them. In the case of the girl I would have filed a QA complaint with whatever agency they were with. But it was so crowded and I had my own student to attend to.

The incidents of what I call incompetence were not confined to OW students. We were gearing up when a group on the same dock was getting ready to go in for an AOW deep dive. The students were being briefed when one of the instructors asked what the procedure was if they overstayed their NDL? Three of them answered and all three were wrong. Why are students going on their first deep dive not knowing what the procedure is for overstaying their NDL? My OW students know how to pull their tables out and look up the emergency deco info for this. Other agencies teach an extended safety stop. There was also no talk of gas planning so if they took an air hog on this dive he could conceivably have an issue with running low or out of air. Why don’t they know beforehand how much air they use? It’s called a SAC rate and in my AOW class we use previous dives to determine this and calculate how much air they may expect to use.

There were some other things that I may detail later but for now what I am trying to say to new divers is ask yourself if anything like this occurred on your OW dives and think about how close you may have come to getting hurt. Ask yourself if you think you should have been taken on your checkouts when you were. Yes they are a new experience, but it should not be that different from the pool in terms of basic skills. Especially in inland quarries in calm water. Yes it’s colder and vis may be worse, but it is not that different in terms of clearing your mask and recovering your reg. You are not supposed to be learning these things on your OW dives. You are being evaluated on your level of competence with them. If you are not comfortable doing them you should not be there. You should still be in the pool. Those little things that concerned you or gave you pause during your course are the things that if allowed to get out of hand could hurt or kill you.

Instructors who lead their students single file in OW are asking for trouble. You are looking to have someone get lost or separated. For what? To expedite a class by not teaching and most importantly reinforcing proper buddy skills? Those of you who think it is ok to dive with gear unsecured should have your gear trashed. You are in fact encouraging it. And when, not if, something fails you have no one to blame but yourself. Heck shops that think they don’t need to provide octo holders and clips for consoles could rip students off by making them by their own as part of their personal gear! At least you’d be trying to say taking care of gear and no danglies are important or, like the buddy system, just paying it lip service.

Shortcuts get people hurt. Short courses show time and time again how they produce divers who barely know how to survive. And when you neglect training in proper buoyancy, trim, proper weighting, rescue skills, and actual buddy skills you risk the lives of your students and give the entire activity a black eye. Regardless of whether or not it still meets standards.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for posting this. I am going for my OW certification in a couple of weekends, and now I have a few things I will pay attention to before I go under. In the pool classes we had a buddy every minute we were in the water and while we were gearing up on deck. All our equipment had to be secured, and we went through the buddy check (finding, one time, that I had my regulator tucked under my BCD -- oops, that is something I'll always remember to check. I'd have a very difficult time believing all that will go at the window at the quarry, but anything can happen. I really just want to go putz around under water and see stuff -- not have some adrenaline pumping scary adventure. If I see any of the stuff you pointed out happening in my class, I will say something and not let it go on. Thanks again.
 
(finding, one time, that I had my regulator tucked under my BCD -- oops, that is something I'll always remember to check.

Don't sweat it. This happens all the time. If you think that's difficult now, try doing it with a 7' primary hose and bungees octo


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
 
Jim,

I think the problem is is that very few people want to admit you can get hurt diving or even worse they know you can but since it would be bad for business they don't emphasize it enough. I know I asked my instructor a bunch of varied questions and when I showed concern about safety his ultimate answer was "Jason, I teach 12 year olds to do this".

Generally speaking I'd agree it is a safe activity as long as everything is done "correctly" (there may be different ways of doing it correctly), but when we start screwing around, deviating, or not planning that safety cone gets narrow really fast.

What you are describing however is sloppy complacency. Some are more prone than others to this little song and dance. The worst part is is that most of the students will never know and will just be sloppy, unsafe divers.
 
With anything though, there is always two sides to the story. I am not defending the instructor in question by any means but it would be good to hear both sides of the story. I agree that the instructor was negligent in having a single column in poor vis. What we don't know is how they were in the pool. I have seen people completely comfortable in the pool and then go out into open water and get nervous and overloaded. The thing to remember when it comes to diving is that ultimately you have to be able to depend on your skill and the skill of your buddy. Poor communication and pushing the limits will get you in trouble. Maybe not right away but it will catch up to you.
 
I suspect I had a "short course" in Jamaica back in Nov 2000. I think it was 3 or 4 days (I was the only student) and I was O/W certified. I went back in April 2001 and a few days later I had my AOW.

My first "local" dive was with an old coworker who had dove Lake Rawlings before. It wasn't a really good dive. My buddy was moving too fast and I could barely see him in front of me. Sometimes I could and sometimes I couldn't. We were up and down up and down crossing the thermocline repeatedly. But I learned several things that day:

1) I had an unalienable right to thumb the dive
2) A good friend doesn't always make a good buddy
3) That despite my headache from the dive, that I knew I would love diving.

Anyways, as for "short courses".... I'm not an instructor but if I ever was, there would be a lot more pool work ( the horizontal mid water column kind, not the knees on the bottom kind ) before ever going in open water.
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately I believe that many dive shops have turned into nothing more than open water certification mills so they can sell gear to new divers because that is where the money really is for them. How can you produce a competent diver in as little as four days? How can you engrain safety skills, and buddy procedures in that short amount of time? The problem is that most people who want to learn to dive have no idea of what to look for in a dive shop. They simply don't know what questions to ask. Most students look at the instructors as some kind of dive expert who knows all and has done all.
I was a product of exactly this type of dive shop. Fortunately I had a friend who was an ex-navy master diver who took me after certification and reinforced proper safety and buddy protocols and helped me with bouyancy skills.
 
My biggest question would be the ratio of students to instructor, to begin with. As you stated there is no way he would be able to safely supervise that large of a group in questionable vis. single file. We all see and have done stupid things, cell phones, speeding, reaching out from ladders, etc. BUT, an instructor overloaded or oblivious to the rest of a group is an accident waiting to happen. Jim, as usual a great report and thanks for posting.
 
AJ, that is one of the biggest things I see in a number of threads related to accidents, near misses, and just simple buddy separation (which in my opinion should NEVER occur in an OW class) is this fixation on prescribed ratios. Just because standards say you can take 6 or 8 students doesn't mean you should. Myself, in the conditions that were present on saturday, would have resulted in taking one buddy pair at time on the first two dives and even with an assitant no more than two pairs on the third and fourth. And even with the assistant I would have made sure I could see the entire group. It could have been done. I also would not have been leading them on the tour. They would be leading with me supervising and directing them from a position where they were not behind me. Remember this is an evaluation of their training. I am supposed to be verifying that they can do all that is required of them to dive as an independent buddy pair the next time they hit the water after this weekend. They should know to stay in proper position, maintain good buoyancy, and safely find their way back to the shore or boat. If I don't think they can do this I am not even supposed to have them in open water according to my agency and RSTC standards.

Sent from my DROID X2 using Tapatalk 2
 
This thread's got me thinking about the whole "complies with standards" point. We know that we have divers who think, "If the DM said it's okay, it must be okay." It stands to reason we may also have instructors who think, "If the standards say it's okay, it must be okay," without applying the critical thinking to determine when the standards are inadequate.

An opportunity for instructors to further their students' education would be to say, "Here's what the agency's standards are, now here's what my (sometimes higher) standards are, and why."

An additional question for students to ask potential instructors could be, "What are your agency's standards and what is your opinion of them? When do you deviate from them, and why?" The answers could reveal both highly ethical instructors and cut-all-possible corners instructors, as well as instructors who just parrot back whatever is in print (which is too often the teaching method of choice, in my earlier experience).

The "complies with standards" line is perhaps best considered as a place to start, adjusting from there as needs dictate. There is compliance with standards, and there is what is necessary and makes sense. I would hope that severe penalties would befall anyone who is connected to a student injury or death due to complying with standards while exercising no common sense.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/swift/

Back
Top Bottom