Im looking at getting one of these two first stages paired to a S600 second.
ScubaPro seems the market the mk25 as a higher preforming reg, with the mk17 coming in second. And it seems a lot of people if they have both use it as their first choice.
I know the mk25 is piston, and the mk17 is a diaphragm and environmentally sealed.
To me the mk17 seems to have a wider temperature range in which you can dive it in, and also because its sealed would be more reliable due to keeping out contaminates...right?
So what gives the Mk25 an edge (if any) over the mk17. Are there benefits to a non-sealed piston design that I'm just not seeing?
ScubaPro seems the market the mk25 as a higher preforming reg, with the mk17 coming in second. And it seems a lot of people if they have both use it as their first choice.
I know the mk25 is piston, and the mk17 is a diaphragm and environmentally sealed.
To me the mk17 seems to have a wider temperature range in which you can dive it in, and also because its sealed would be more reliable due to keeping out contaminates...right?
So what gives the Mk25 an edge (if any) over the mk17. Are there benefits to a non-sealed piston design that I'm just not seeing?