If you don't like that approach you can simply bean the SOB over the head and "wrassle" the reg from him and watch him bullet to the surface.
This is basically the only justification I've been able to come up with for the gladius I dive with.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
If you don't like that approach you can simply bean the SOB over the head and "wrassle" the reg from him and watch him bullet to the surface.
...and why I no longer padlock my octopus while diving. Sometimes you can't lay your hand on the key when you need it.I'd say it's a great example of the disadvantages of one particular configuration...
I'd say it's a great example of the disadvantages of one particular configuration...
The configuration wasn't the problem ... the problem (one of them, anyway) was that the person who set it up didn't do it properly.
Any configuration can be misapplied ... saw a guy one time take a long hose under his arm and wrap it twice around his head. I doubt that'd have been very deployable ...
... Bob (Grateful Diver)
Regardless of what you donate, if the secondary isn't working, you're going to be buddy breathing (at least in a team of two).
The central issue is simply one of whose need for gas is more crucial at the moment of the OOG. I contend it's the diver who is actually OOG. Getting him a 100% known working regulator is paramount. If my secondary turns out not to be working, fine, we'll handle that in turn (just as we would if your octo didn't work). Your method, however, would have the OOG diver waiting even longer (and you'd now be donating your primary to a *really* panicked diver). Best to avoid all this panic and give up the known working regulator from the start. There's a reason this method has been adopted by basically every technical diving agency in existence.
If you're not comfortable without a regulator for a short while, you probably should find a new hobby.
I think that's something people should bear in mind. Good chance the OOG didn't happen in isolation so it may not be your only challenge.
With regard to primary Vs secondary donation: I think you make very valid points DCBC however for me, the part that I never liked about donating an ocotpus is that they tend to be somewhat poorly behaved in terms of position and I feel there is genuine risk in someone, whether donor or receiver fumbling in a stressful situation trying to find a backup somewhere. I'm pretty sure Lamont witnessed a fatality because of a diver that could not unloosen the donor's secondary (please correct me someone if I'm wrong).
I like donating primary and having my backup under my chin. For me, it really really feels right - I feel very secure in this solution, much more so than the octopus alternative. It has some drawbacks, sure, but not in an OOG situation as far as my limited experienced is concerned.
Cheers,
J
Whatever you wear IS the configuration, not some ideal. The diver's gear in question was poorly configured.
You presume too much; not all divers today know how to buddy breathe.
You presume too much; not all divers today know how to buddy breathe.
There was also a reason in the past why every training agency accepted the way that I teach to be the way that it should be taught and buddy breathing was a requirement. Now most divers are not trained in this manner. Don't be lecturing me "that the training agencies know best." They don't all agree.
Of course, you KNEW that I was talking about a standard recreational rig vs a long-hose rig.