Chaiyz
Registered
Thumbs up Bob!
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
The diver was doing something legal in my state the post would have been considered hunter harassment. The way that this was gone about is all wrong there should be some type of reason to protect a game species not public sediment.Thumbs up Bob!
So where do i sign up for the petition to stop the harassing and threatening of this
diver who never broke the law but is being unlawfully persecuted?
I'm all for preserving the environment, making protected areas etc, but they can't be put ahead of human life, and if the users here are so fanatical they'll threaten human life for political gain, what kind of world are they trying to preserve?
You know,i think the speed limit in your neighborhood should be lower, so I'm going to phone and harass and threaten you, even though you obey the present speed limit! bunch of idiots.
Absolutely agree with kjw2547 and Dave Hendrick. The ocean is for all of us to use, and harvesting animals is a way of life on land and in the water. It has been for thousands of years, and eating what he harvests himself is SO much better than eating the chinese farmed crap they pedal in the markets. This bleeding heart crap makes me sick.
Bob, you should be ashamed of yourself for harrassing a hunter legally harvesting game.
I am going to leave this page. While Bob may do good things for the community, The fact that this community endorses threatening a 19 year old that did something LEGALLY is more upsetting than the other issue. Yes you changed this kids mind (even if it was with intimidation), but condoning such action is not what the community should be about. I do not wish to have any part of it. Good Bye.
Funny how a stream of users have made their first post within a single day, dragging up a lot of petty arguments that were better buried back in the original thread.
For you would-be defenders: you aren't doing your subject any favors dragging this stuff back up, holding him up as a righteous example of law-abiding cleanliness. Bob didn't threaten anyone, all he did was relate in public something he witnessed in a public place. The behavior he witnessed was distasteful, and when some of the other less than pleasant ways the young man in question comported himself started showing up in the spotlight, there was a lot of negative reaction to the public image he went to the trouble of making for himself.
The young man in question has since apparently made steps to become part of his society rather than wipe his tail with it, I'd say it's a good opportunity to let the past go and let him get on with that. To bring this back up will just force the other camp to keep pointing out why he came under such attack in the first place.