@Ioncloud9 this is really going to echo things said above, but here goes.
Yes the Cyklon was released in 1958, no the second stage hasn't changed since then. Yes it is using an old first stage design that hasn't changed in over 20 years.
Scubapro 108 was released in 1963 and most non-adjustable regulators are based on this design. It has not changed since then
The Scubapro 109 was released in 1969 and is the regulator that most all high end regulators are based on.
Scubapro Mk5 was a 5 port swivel turret, balanced piston first stage. Released in 1965, it is the base design that is still being used today.
The Scubapro 156 Balanced Adjustable was released in 1985 and is an improvement on the 109 by making it a balanced second stage.
The 108 has been copied by many companies and with slight changes in machining tolerances and case design, it has stayed largely unchanged.
The 109/156 has gone to new case designs that are more cost effective to produce but also have better air flow through them for improved venturi and overall work of breathing. Poppets have been improved to smooth out the breathing curve, but the base design is unchanged.
The MK5 has gone through minor improvements to get to the MK25, but nothing radical.
Diaphragm regulators are in a similar boat.
This improvement is really no different than the engine in your car going from a carb to direct injection. The base design is still suck-squeeze-bang-blow, but there have been step improvements.
Poseidon has really the only "out of the box" regulator designs in the last 30 years with the Jetstream/Xstream and now the Mk3 first stage, but there is still only so many ways to make a demand valve.
We have met the limit on work of breathing because anything appreciably better will freeflow. Unless you have something radical in valve design that would somehow improve anything, please bring it up, but these types of valves are used in all sorts of industrial applications and these are just adapted variants of those types of valves.
On the computer front. What are you proposing for improvements?
Same with fins, there have been improvements and step changes, the Deep6 Eddy fins are leaps and bounds better than Jet Fins, but still on the same base design. Many companies have tried to come out with innovative fins, but they just don't show any serious improvements so what's the point in investing?