Search results

I have about 100 dives on mine. Been using one since they first came out. I really like it. I don't have a problem reading the display and the menues are really easy to scroll through and change. Some things to know about the hud... It is a stand alone computer It takes about 10 dives to get...

Lightly used regulator combo. Was used on about 10 dives before last rebuild. IP is 145psi with a 500psi supply pressure. Breathing effort is 1.2 inches of water. Price includes shipping anywhere state side. Any questions please ask.

Barely used 5th Gen

Small Black Novas comes with mesh sack used only 5 times in pool 5th Gen with anti-slip grip

Sorry Jason, This is no longer available. We do have a used G260 tactical ($250) and used S550 ($189) on the used gear rack if interested. We also have a DEMO A700 with light pool use for $400.00

The S550 is related to the S600. The closest production of this regulator was the S360 (same regulator different face plates) This reg is the same as a S600 but does not have a user adjustment for air flow. It does however have a dive/pre-dive switch. New hose New mouth piece color white...

We do not have an assembly fee, I was just saying assembling the tanks is a built in cost during a visual inspection process. Trying hard to explain that I do not charge for a VIP then an assembly fee on top of that. The VIP covers the inspection and putting them back together.

And our VIP - Fill - Hydro is $50 So it's only a $10 dollar difference. I don't see a big gap here.

Rebuilt New mouthpiece Tuned, tested, and ready to go with supply pressure of 145 IP at 500 psi. Any questions please ask.

If someone brought me new cylinders that were disassembled the VIP and assembly fee would be $15 and the fill would be $10 for a total of $25. This is our same fee if a tank is brought in put together with air in it. We do not really make a distinction between tanks that are brought in new or...

Contribute to what at this point. This thread is so splintered I don't even know what we are talking about anymore. Many of you have said you don't believe what I have stated, which is straight from SP. Do you think all the money SP has spent on engineering, testing, and development means...

I thought you guys didn't like sales pitches haha. But Id be happy to talk about 17 function.

As per SP technical instruction... if you aren't trying to catch me in saying 2nd stages have an IP haha... if we are trying to get optimal performance at lower tank pressure.. IP is set for the lower tank pressure and is where also to tune the 2nd stage to its desired cracking effort.

I have made 0 false statements. In all seriousness what issue are you having with your pilot?

Trust me I want to.

Our only blunder is not telling someone who makes 10 dives a year over the span of 2 vacations that if they don't have a $1000.00 reg they will die and not be able to breathe well. Just about anything will work for them. I believe that if they decide to purchase ANY SP reg they will have years...

Then maybe you should study up haha.

Yes in the context of the reply... the reg in question was being called a bad design for balance issues. I was saying the inverse IP is done on purpose. Do other similar regs have similar IP inversion obviously yes.

And I have said nothing contrary to that.

You want me to write you a tech novel on here about how piston and diaphragm regs work, cause I'd be happy to. Thats not really what the discussion is about. We are arguing engineering quirks that people either say is smart or complete bull ****. I am obviously on SP's side here. Members here...