Slamfire
Contributor
Do we really? Why? Since participating in this post I've been critically asking this to myself and I am not totally sure about the answer.I think as divers we want to see the sport grow and we can find the passing involvement frustrating.
Pros: Larger voice print to be heard in society. This could help with the creation of diving parks and end up facilitating access to dive sites.
Cons: Diver "pollution" harming reefs by touching them. Death of divers closing dive spots.
I am unsure as to whether a larger market base would motivate faster, better developments in diving technology. I guess you could argue it would, but I am not entirely sure that it would not turn out to be a spurious argument in reality.
You could also argue that a larger voice print would help us secure favorable legislations. But then, I am of the opinion that we are going to be better off with the minimum amount of legal restraints possible. I guess you could argue that a larger voice print could provide better insurance against unfavorable legislation. But then we could say a larger group is easier to notice and target... So again I'm unsure on this.
From my point of view, the growth of the scuba sport only presents clear advantages if you stand to somehow profit monetarily from it. Only then you can see that a larger market base translates into more $$$. But for somebody like me, who is not interested in making a single penny out of scuba activities, I really don't see the lack of growth as a major tragedy. It could even have some advantages.