- Messages
- 19,804
- Reaction score
- 18,673
- Location
- Philadelphia and Boynton Beach
- # of dives
- 1000 - 2499
Well there's 2 problems I see:
1. Increased cost of Nitrox:
Consider this thought experiment: Company XYZ creates a "cure" for a non-fatal sickness (cold or something). There is no double-blind study to support its effectiveness, but people using it seem to think it makes their cold better. The company charges $5 for a daily pill. While working at company XYZ you discover it is just a sugar pill. Has the company done anything wrong? After all, cold's aren't dangerous, just annoying: if people feel better after using the pill, then that is $5 well spent. Still, to me, something feels wrong about this.
2. Passing the info on to others
It's one thing to spend your own money on Nitrox for the sole reason of "feeling better", but passing along non-scientific information to others means they might be wasting their money as well. So yes, I do think it "matters" if it is true or not, especially when it would be realtively easy to test.
Prescription medications cannot make a claim for efficacy unless efficacy and safety have been satisfactorily demonstated with well designed clinical trials evaluated by the FDA. The ingredients in prescription drugs are well documented. On the other hand, nutritional supplements and some over the counter medications may may efficacy claims that are not substantiated and where safety may not have been adequately demonstrated. The ingredients, particularly in nutrional supplements, may not be so well documented or standardized.
For nitrox, extended bottom times when a dive is limited by NDL seems to be a well documented benefit. Reduction of fatigue, on the other hand, seems to be an unsubstantiated claim. Buyer beware.
Good diving, Craig
Last edited: