OMyMyOHellYes
Contributor
In spite of what "ex-perts" (does that mean "used to be pert"?) at the LDS say, it has nothing to do with age of the tank. Many of them just draw an arbitrary line on the calendar and say "no". That way you don't have to know anything.
So long as the hydro inspections are properly carried out and it has a current VIP inspection, it should TECHNICALLY be good to go.
Even the old Lux and WK tanks made from 6351 aluminum alloy. Stay with me.
The 6061 aluminum alloy has no special restriction (assumes full DOT certification (or special converted and stamped "DOT" not just special permit - other rules would apply then) regardless of age). That includes all Catalina and Lux tanks after mid-1988 (IIRC - Lux has a table (google it) that says when Lux converted to 6061 alloy and dropped the 6351 alloy from productions (different size tanks were phased over at different times, but (again, IIRC) any Lux tanks after mid 1988 should be good to go with just a current hydro and viz. This bottle, Lux post-mid-1988 is 6061 and GTG.
The old 6351 alloy tanks, the ones potentially susceptible to sustained load cracking, are not barred from use, they just require more rigorous testing. At each hydro interval, they must undergo special eddy-current or some other ultra-sonic type of non-destructive testing (eddy current is the most common) to look for stress crack formation that may not yet be visible. The hydro stamp for those tanks passing would include "VE" or "UE" at the end of the hydro stamp. Lux had some other intermediate testing requirement for their 6351 tanks - since I'm unlikely to ever encounter one for inspection, i don't bother memorizing them. i can look them up if need be.
Now, the fire extinguisher company that does most all of the hydros in my immediate area refuses to hydro any aluminum tank manufactured prior to 1990. But that is their policy/rule, that is easy to implement that anybody in their shop can be instructed on and follow. It is not a legal regulation. As you likely have found, if you ask three people working in any particular LDS, you may likely get five different "rules" regarding tanks and inspection criteria.
OMMOHY
So long as the hydro inspections are properly carried out and it has a current VIP inspection, it should TECHNICALLY be good to go.
Even the old Lux and WK tanks made from 6351 aluminum alloy. Stay with me.
The 6061 aluminum alloy has no special restriction (assumes full DOT certification (or special converted and stamped "DOT" not just special permit - other rules would apply then) regardless of age). That includes all Catalina and Lux tanks after mid-1988 (IIRC - Lux has a table (google it) that says when Lux converted to 6061 alloy and dropped the 6351 alloy from productions (different size tanks were phased over at different times, but (again, IIRC) any Lux tanks after mid 1988 should be good to go with just a current hydro and viz. This bottle, Lux post-mid-1988 is 6061 and GTG.
The old 6351 alloy tanks, the ones potentially susceptible to sustained load cracking, are not barred from use, they just require more rigorous testing. At each hydro interval, they must undergo special eddy-current or some other ultra-sonic type of non-destructive testing (eddy current is the most common) to look for stress crack formation that may not yet be visible. The hydro stamp for those tanks passing would include "VE" or "UE" at the end of the hydro stamp. Lux had some other intermediate testing requirement for their 6351 tanks - since I'm unlikely to ever encounter one for inspection, i don't bother memorizing them. i can look them up if need be.
Now, the fire extinguisher company that does most all of the hydros in my immediate area refuses to hydro any aluminum tank manufactured prior to 1990. But that is their policy/rule, that is easy to implement that anybody in their shop can be instructed on and follow. It is not a legal regulation. As you likely have found, if you ask three people working in any particular LDS, you may likely get five different "rules" regarding tanks and inspection criteria.
OMMOHY