Question about weighting with doubles in Florida

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

looks like it should be fine.... even with HP100's

Manufacturer & Nominal CapacityService pressure, psiActual air capacity, ft3Outer diameter, inLength without valve, inEmpty weight, lbs (w/o valve)Buoyancy Empty, lbs (w/valve)Buoyancy Full, lbs (w/valve)


Luxfer 80300077.47.2526.0631.384.4-1.4
Luxfer S80300078.2822.9335.122.26-3.6
Catalina S80300077.47.2525.831.64-1.8



Faber 1003180 +10%1007.2524.0138.7-7.26-14.76
PST E7-1003442 PSI1007.2524.1233-1-8.5
Worth X7-10034421007.252433-2.5-10
PST 10035001027.2523.9434.1-1.3-8.8
Heiser 1042400 +10%104827.3647.4-7.46-15.26

seeing your wing needs to float your kit,

2 x -4 [twin 80's] + (-4) [plate] + (-8) [SWAG for manifold, regs, etc] = -20# .... add your lead and I think you are still below the 45# lift...

(I'd like to hear others thoughts on this)


however, that camera.....:shocked2:
 
I need a SS plate + 7 pounds in the channel to dive my double 80's in a 5mil suit in saltwater, otherwise I'm a bit floaty at the end of the dive.
 
Yeah, I think that I figured it out... I guess a 45# would be OK, since I would only be using it with aluminum doubles and an aluminum plate in salt water. What do you think?

---------- Post added April 10th, 2014 at 10:35 AM ----------
Just ordered a #45... pretty good deal!

Since 99.999% of my diving is wetsuit diving in warm water a drysuit is not in my near future so I forked over the $90 for a dual bladder.
I'm diving twin steel 100s with an aluminum plate. Twin Al 80s are nice and light, but there's very little margin on reserves using those.
If I have to carry another bottle just for the extra gas it defeats the purpose of a pair of 80s IMO.

Using an RMV .7 for bottom and .6 for deco, a dive to 145' for 25 minutes = 97 cu. ft of back gas and 28 cu. ft of deco gas. Lost or missing deco gas = 144 cu. ft of back gas.

I prefer a little more breathing room, pun intended :)
 
Since 99.999% of my diving is wetsuit diving in warm water a drysuit is not in my near future so I forked over the $90 for a dual bladder.
I'm diving twin steel 100s with an aluminum plate. Twin Al 80s are nice and light, but there's very little margin on reserves using those.
If I have to carry another bottle just for the extra gas it defeats the purpose of a pair of 80s IMO.

Using an RMV .7 for bottom and .6 for deco, a dive to 145' for 25 minutes = 97 cu. ft of back gas and 28 cu. ft of deco gas. Lost or missing deco gas = 144 cu. ft of back gas.

I prefer a little more breathing room, pun intended :)


Yup, that's what I was thinking... although I guess I could just plan shorter dives, I don't really want to be so limited. Probably better to have more gas, the dual bladder and the aluminum plate with the 100s if I decide to go wet.

Thanks!
 
Now if you know someone who wanted to to get rid of a Withes Fusion for a 6'5" 240# friend in Florida I would be glad to to give you my dual bladder and brave all those who would laugh at me for diving dry!
 
Twin Al 80s are nice and light....

Compared to what?

Aluminum:

Luxfer 80 - 31.38#
Luxfer S80 - 35.12#
Catalina S80 - 31.6#

Steel:

Faber 100 - 38.7# (I'll give you that one)
Worth X7-100 - 33#
PST E7-100 - 33#
PST 100 - 34.1#

What am I missing? :confused:




 
Compared to what?

What am I missing? :confused:

Have you used a pair of AL80s?
A wetsuit diver can swim up a set of 80s with very little effort and no air on the wing, compared to any steel twin set. That = nice and light!
 
"buoyant", not "light"..... (on land, they are quite similar):D
 
http://cavediveflorida.com/Rum_House.htm

Back
Top Bottom