broncobowsher
Contributor
As much as I would like to not have the 2 batteries in the transmitters, I think I still prefer the data on the NERD and not the Controller.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
As much as I would like to not have the 2 batteries in the transmitters, I think I still prefer the data on the NERD and not the Controller.
While we are diverging from modification into the dreamland of how it would be nice if rEvo built it this way...The beauty of DiveCAN (or any CAN bus for that matter) is that the sensors write to the bus and anything monitoring that bus (whether it be a controller or a monitor) can display that information.
Anyway, as @stuartv said, it's not a reason to choose one CCR over another, but it's certainly a very nice feature that I wish other CCRs utilized. rEvo doesn't use a "head" so I'm not sure what that implementation would look like, however.
Where would the high pressure transducer be mounted? The only feeds into any box are low pressure. Thus you’d need TWO wired transducers with DiveCAN interfaces that are waterproof and can be plugged into the bus. How much are those five pin DiveCAN connectors?While we are diverging from modification into the dreamland of how it would be nice if rEvo built it this way...
Adding hardwired pressure transducers shouldn't be difficult. I imagine it would be very much like the input from the RMS.