There was a recent discussion about valves and the quarter turn back technique on the instructor forum, but it brought up the question of how it applies to tec, so here goes, I will ask the question again in a different context:
All formal tec training has told me to have manifold valves all the way open, I cant help thinking that valves turned on four full turns are shut down far more quickly and easily than those that are open fourteen. During repeated valve shutdown drills, I often find the excersize tires the forearms to the point of cramping.
How much gas can you lose/save in 10 extra turns of the valve?? And how high up the list of "badness" is the problem of rolloff in comparison to ten extra seconds of gas loss during catastrophic failure??
I personally have never experienced roll-off while using doubles, and dont consider it a hugely life threatening situation as it can be readily monitored. I do consider slow response shutting down valves during catastrophic air loss a serious problem that should be prioritized much higher than roll off.
Opinions please.......
All formal tec training has told me to have manifold valves all the way open, I cant help thinking that valves turned on four full turns are shut down far more quickly and easily than those that are open fourteen. During repeated valve shutdown drills, I often find the excersize tires the forearms to the point of cramping.
How much gas can you lose/save in 10 extra turns of the valve?? And how high up the list of "badness" is the problem of rolloff in comparison to ten extra seconds of gas loss during catastrophic failure??
I personally have never experienced roll-off while using doubles, and dont consider it a hugely life threatening situation as it can be readily monitored. I do consider slow response shutting down valves during catastrophic air loss a serious problem that should be prioritized much higher than roll off.
Opinions please.......