@iain/hsm I was also half looking at it for me... I don't have the power ability to run my SA6's and due to noise can't leave them as gas so was looking at a Walter Kidde which uses a high pressure oil pump vs. splash lube so it can be under-driven, or a SA3. The WK has a massive cost advantage on upfront cost and rebuild parts though, Rix likes to rape us out here.
Can the 6's be run on a 1hp motor at super slow rpm's without problems? If so that may be my ticket since I already have a pair.
Yes you can run the SA-6 on a 1 BHP motor by reducing the RPM and the discharge pressure
The cooling fan flow speed over RPM is as near as, and cancels each other out, so at half the RPM is half the flow with half the heat generated balanced by half the heat load generated cooled. (near enough)
You just cant fit the belt guard unless you lift the 1 HP motor up on a couple of brackets to make the drive shafts at near equal height. I need to work out the driver pulley diameter and the motor speed
Also the belt length will change if you want to retain the 14 inch shaft distance between centres.
You also dont want to get the driver pulley too small or the belt/belts will slip, two twin SPZ cogged belt size work better at tranfering the load than the old single SBA or V belt size.
Or use your VFD and direct drive the block variable speed. We did one some time back it was a thing of beauty but it will need an additional opposing shaft balancing plate if you remove the flywheel.
Now as for the WK alternative I'm guessing as the WK has not been made in 30+ years your talking ex army surplus cost and the rebuild parts similar are only available ex surplus while stocks last. In other words the parts were bought scrap and the price you pay is pure profit to the supplier you get them from while stocks last.
The Rix parts costs are by contrast frankly very reasonable, they at least offer a printed spares parts price list each year so to my mind are the only company that offer this. Spare parts costs are a critical aspect in choosing a compressor without knowing the spare parts price in writing up front I would not consider any brand or any model.
Now the issue we all have is that these Rix parts are for a military application with both a NSN and NATO stock number, each part has to be supplied with full traceability QA shelf life, etc etc. Further some of the testing (X-ray, dye pen and PMI cost more than the product itself.
Add to this that some of the Mil-Spec components O-ring for example have to be made from a known compound of known age and shelf like and each one identified with a yellow dot (I kid you not) All add a cost that only the military are prepared to pay.
In time as the full Mil-Spec stuff runs down and the commercial build alternatives are introduced these will replace the military model and parts will in addition be considerably cheaper.
Unlike your WK alternative I guess.