pescador775:
When the tank is immersed in air, dissipation of heat is by convection which is inefficient. In a water bath, heat is carried away by conduction which is very efficient given the physical characteristics of water. This is why a diver's body loses heat so rapidly, even in relatively warm water.
Actually...no, they are both due to conduction, and yes, water is about 23 times more conductive than air, I agree with you there, but that's not the point I was getting at here.
I was getting at the point of forced convection, which seems to be used much more widely than any conductive cooling systems.
We both agree that heat is transferrred from the air inside the tank into the walls of the tank. And we both agree that is a slow proces, not an instantaneous one as you continuously fill the tank. Now that heat has to dissipate somewhere. You choose a water bath which is nice b/c water dissipates heat pretty well, but it has a drawback, is there's no flow. Without flow, you cannot have forced convective heat transfer, which seems to be the application of choice in many cooling systems. Why? Because the rate of heat transfer now becomes dependent on things such as the velocity of the surrounding fluid (in this case, it would be air).
So as I see it, there is 1 "pro" to using a water bath, and that is that it dissipates heat better than air, where as the risk of introducing moisture into your fill whip ot tank valve has now greatly increased. As we all know, water inside of a tank is bad.
On the flip side, you could just fill slowly (my brother and I use the term "slow like a turtle" when we fill tanks) and allow the heat to dissipate at the same rate it is generated and not have to worry about the mariginal decrease in pressure you'll get at the end of the cycle.