Gummy Urethane? I've never encountered any gummy urethane. I have seen various rubbers become gummy with age.
The vast majority of bladder damage is via impact, and we did a *bunch* of controlled impact testing ~10 years ago. A weighted rod with a 3/4" ballbearing in the end was dropped from repeatable heights on to a hardened and ground steel "anvil"
We tried many different combos of shell material and bladder materials.
The bad news is the very best performers would suffer damage at fairly modest impact velocities, (energies) meaning pretty much all wings are subject to pinch flat damage.
The good news is some combo do perform better than others. IMO it is ability of the materials to attenuate the impact energy that determines the resistance to impact, not tear strength.
Thicker, pliant materials consistently performed better than laminated textiles, i.e. 400-800 denier fabrics laminated to a ~.005" of urethane.
The reason why DSS continues to use true duplex weave 1050 ballistic nylons for shells is not because 1050 is very strong (it is robust) but because the duplex yarns and basket weave make the material think and sort of springy in cros section. That's the same reason we use .030 straight urethane films for bladders, .030 can attenuate more energy.
Think about shooting a handgun into wet phone book, or into a piece of .125 thick steel. The steel may be "stronger" but the phone book stops the round for simple reason the wet phone book attenuates the energy and the steel sheet fails.
Tobin