There is an actual difference in the steel.
Thanks
@2airishuman for that explanation.
I've been following this thread with very keen interest since it started. I started comparing different tank specs and the only logical explanation to me was different steels. However, I could find nothing definitive in writing to support that. In fact, information on both Faber and Worthington HP and LP tanks said they all are chrome moly tanks.
But, I also know from my own experience working with pressure vessels that even slight changes in steel alloy content can make a huge difference in that particular alloys strength and ductility. And, even when two alloys have the exact same alloy content, processes like heat treatment and cold hardening can change strength and ductility dramatically.
Closer to home for us, if you look strictly at the specs on the Worthington LP85 and HP100 (without knowing they were HP or LP), the outer diameters are identical. They are both Chrome Moly cylinders. And, the weight per inch on the "85" tank is slightly higher than the "100" tank. From this we could conclude that "85" has a slightly higher wall thickness than the "100". I say that because generally speaking slight differences in alloy content can't account for the weight difference. This might erroneously lead us to believe that the 85 is the HP tank and the 100 is the LP tank.
So, the difference is either in the alloy content or whether the steel was subjected to some hardening process before that tanks were manufactured. Again, there's nothing I could find in writing anywhere that specifically states what the difference is.
Sorry about the geek out moment. Brittle fracture and cold overpressure failure of pressure vessels is one of the subjects I used to teach. I couldn't help myself.