I was going to post this on the whine and cheese thread, but then I thought it needs the most exposure it can get.
Am I alone in my thinking, in that when I see a reply to a subject that was discussed back when Mike Nelson was still a houshold name, that this person replying should have at least checked the date of the thread before resurecting it?
I know that some people have nothing better to do than dig up ancient threads. But come on here, what could possibly be gained in responding to a thread about a BCD problem, or any other issue for that fact, three or four years after the last post on the subject?
I think we should start a movement to CLOSE threads that are over 6 or 9 months old.
What say you "moderators" or "grand pooh bahs" of SB?
Am I alone in my thinking, in that when I see a reply to a subject that was discussed back when Mike Nelson was still a houshold name, that this person replying should have at least checked the date of the thread before resurecting it?
I know that some people have nothing better to do than dig up ancient threads. But come on here, what could possibly be gained in responding to a thread about a BCD problem, or any other issue for that fact, three or four years after the last post on the subject?
I think we should start a movement to CLOSE threads that are over 6 or 9 months old.
What say you "moderators" or "grand pooh bahs" of SB?