Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Wetsuits used here tend to be of the rashguard variety, thin shorties or the thinnest fullsuit the person owns, something I had already taken into account. I used "ditching weight" more as a compensation for the wing if it were underspec'd and if the tanks were overspec'd. Of course, if deco had been aquired, the tanks themselves would be more bouyant as well. "Ditching" would only need to be done at the beginning in the event something happened.DA Aquamaster:I'll also second the concern that you are on the edge already with tanks, bands, regulators and stage bottle and have little if any margin to compensate for wetsuit compression at depth.
The words "doubles", "stage bottle", and "ditching lead" used in the same paragraph also make me extremely nervous. Ditching lead should always be a last resort as it will in most circumstances result in an ascent all the way to the surface - something that is just not an option on a deco dive. This would certainly be the case if you dropped lead on the bottom to offset wetsuit compression.
Sea-Diver:And then there are always those other factors like:
Extra weight of.....
e) redundant air source (spare air?)
This all might sound really obvious but it all adds up to negative weight. It all adds up quick.
I agree...dumping weight should not be the option to make the system work
The absolute negative buoyancy of the cylinders isn't the important thing here, it's the swing of the cylinders and (I'll assume) wetsuit. Those are the only variable buoyancy items in your kit (ignoring your lungs).Halthron:I was talking with a technical instructor for ANDI/TDI earlier today and he mentioned having used doubles (AL 80s) with an Al 80 stage bottle on a 35 lb wing. The more I thought about it, I thought, why not? A full Al 80 is negative by what, about 2 lbs? Three of them is 6 and if you're using a SS plate, that's another 5-6 lbs. Then 14 lbs of lead to offset the bouyancy those three tanks would have when empty and you're at 26 lbs.
Am I missing something here? Sure, not every 30 lb wing is really 30 lbs you need to expect +/- 1-2 lbs. but the total is still under the fudge value. Is there some reason I'm missing why this wouldn't work, especially if some of that lead was ditchable?
:05:ianr33:Haven't seen too many people diving with doubles,stage and a Spare Air
Halthron:I was talking with a technical instructor for ANDI/TDI earlier today and he mentioned having used doubles (AL 80s) with an Al 80 stage bottle on a 35 lb wing. The more I thought about it, I thought, why not? A full Al 80 is negative by what, about 2 lbs? Three of them is 6 and if you're using a SS plate, that's another 5-6 lbs. Then 14 lbs of lead to offset the bouyancy those three tanks would have when empty and you're at 26 lbs.
Am I missing something here? Sure, not every 30 lb wing is really 30 lbs you need to expect +/- 1-2 lbs. but the total is still under the fudge value. Is there some reason I'm missing why this wouldn't work, especially if some of that lead was ditchable?
paolov:them tanks won't go empty as the rule of thirds prevail. at depth if anyone of the group reaches that limit the group all follows the most conservative .
And as far as the wing getting stuck on the doubles... never happened. the preparation makes the dive fail safe.
also the weight used by the diver/s is around 2 to 6 lbs only assuming these are done in warm water area.. and calm seas
from our experiences here.
ianr33:Yeah but what happens when one diver has a freeflow or other failure and you end up sharing air with one divers tank empty and the other at 500 pounds?
You can not assume you will absolutely have gas left at the end of the dive,otherwise why bother taking it??