He said his budget was $3000 plus the camera, $4,000 total.
Jack
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Jack
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Unfortunately the canon cameras do not offer any decent control for video only full automatic with no choice of exposure control/ISO etc
With $4000 I would change the LX7 to a Sony RX100M2 however with that camera you also need a wide angle, a close up lens
All those items with an Inon UWLH-100 and a UCL165LD with a fix LD bayonet adapter and a red filter take you to around $4,117
This is pretty much the best compact set up you can get you can expand it further with an additional UCL165 for super macro or a red filter
In my opinion the RX100M2 is a better camera but it requires additional investment in lenses than the LX7
I don't have comparable video of the mark2 (will have it mid december as I have a trip planned) my youtube channel should give you an idea of what the lx7 and Rx100 mark I can do Interceptor121 - YouTube
This thread over on wetpixel might interest you:
RX-100mk2 vs G16 vs LX7 - Consumer Digicams/Housings - Wetpixel :: Underwater Photography Forums
Decisions, decisions......
Matt
Of the cameras you describe for mostly shooting video, one of the NEX cameras may well be your best choice with the Nauticam housings. The NEX 6 is a very nice camera with most of the quality of the NEX 7, a bit smaller, good controls and a decent price. With a wide angle port and arms and video lights you should be at about $3000. There's also the NEX 5R & now 5T that are available for a little less. All of which will give you much better video than a compact, with better lens choices and future system expansion.
For video lights we prefer either the iTorch Pro 5+ (1500 lumens) at only $265, or the new Fish-Lite with 2400 lumens (also has red light) for $499. If you want better quality, a fully adjustable output, along with a really nice display, wet charging (like the Solas), and interchangeable batteries; then check out the new Fix NEO 1200 or NEO 2000. Each comes with 4 mounts too, so that they work out to be $85 less than the respective Solas.
Send me a PM/email if you'd like to get a system quote, we can help you weigh the differences.
The fix lights are interesting however am not sure we are in the same ball park here. Assume you keep the same tray and lights the cheapest NEx5R with Nauticam a dome port and zoom gear is $2,100 on your site plus $600 for the camera with a 18-55 lens you are at $2,700 and your 35mm is 27-82.5 which really is not any good for any wide plus even with a diopter optical quality is not great behind the dome.
The Rx100M2 with nauticam costs $1,700 even adding an Inon wide angle you are at $2,200 but now you have 18-100mm with a diopter. A set up that is definitely more versatile and you can shoot a 10 feet Manta and a nudibranch in the same dive
If there is one thing I like about taking a compact underwater is that I can do all range of video shots a bit like having a camcorder. I can do wide, medium, close, super close at good level of quality at a shooting distance where my lights actually work. When you try to do that with a DSLR/Mirrorless you are confined to 24-100mm best case and you have to choose a dome port that at long focal distance does not really give you great image quality
I have checked this avenue several times and yet have to find something that really give me the same flexibility vs quality compromise
He said his budget was $3000 plus the camera, $4,000 total.
Jack
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD