markmantei
Contributor
Why cant we just agree that both have their advantages.
Because I'm the OP and I want this argument settled once and for all
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Why cant we just agree that both have their advantages.
I think some just don't feel the perceived advantages out weigh the perceived disadvantages.
For the beginning or even advanced technical diver (open water), I don't see what the advantages are.So I am seriously considering starting tech training in the next month. snip
Rob, you act like a free flow is the only flavor of reg failure. The risk of Losing half your gas is asinine, especially if the dive doesn't require you to take on that additional risk.
Thats a very important thing to consider, as when dives go tits up, all the textbook stuff usually gets shaken up a bit. I prefer to dive a system that gives me the widest range of options across all tthe most common failure modes.
markmantei:In the event of a reg failure, the regs can be swapped, as they are accessible (not fun I assume underwater with dry gloves). I would think this would take sufficient time to need to be on a 3rd gas source (stage or team member), also in dire circumstances one could breath directly from the tank valve, although I'm sure this would be in life or death decision time, I bet there is some real danger of lung over-expansion injury without the regulators. Neither options are available in backmount, but then there is the isolator.