SFScuba
Guest
ChrisA:I don't understand why there would be a dfferent risk of flooding. Any camera if you get some sand in the o-ring is going to flood. There is no difference, digital, film housed or UW camera the riskis about the same. Well, there is one difference: cost. Flooding a $1,000 camera is 5 times worse than flooding a $200 camera but the chance of it happening is about the same.
Yup, understand that. What I meant in the context of the discussion was that I could but an inexpensive dive camera in the DC250 and if it flooded, I would still have my topside camera to use for the other vacation pictures. I realize the risk is the same, and exactly as you said, flooding a $1000 camera is 5 times worse than a $200. I am trying to figure out whether buying a lower priced camera and working within the limitations of the camera, I could still be satisfied with the pictures.
I've been looking at three cameras and housings: Canon A520, A95, and Nikon Coolpix 5600. But these will all run close to $500 before I'm done. However, for $200 I could have a camera for diving which I do about twice a year...