... I wanted to get a few dives under my belt before starting Advanced Open Water. To me it seems it would be smart to get a handle on breathing, buoyancy control, and comfortable with my own equipment before starting more instruction......I do understand that the AOW dives are mostly fun dives. .
This is where the AOW course fails to address (
what I believe is) the training requirements of most OW graduates.
The entire...'
AOW now or later' debate is spawned from the fact that the course itself provides
neither a boost to fundamental skills, nor a progression in diving capability.
If AOW focused on developing the fundamentals introduced on the OW course, then the answer would be easy;
do it sooner rather than later. Build strong foundations from the very start, as a platform on which to build
quality experience.
If AOW focused on developing more advanced diving competencies, a skill-set beyond OW-level certification, then the answer would
also be easy;
do it later, after first gaining experience and getting your fundamentals refined.
In reality, AOW can be
both... or
neither of those things. That depends entirely on the individual instructor. The course is flexible enough to be focused on building fundamentals
or building progressive, more advanced, skills. It just requires an equally flexible instructor who can identify and deliver the
specific training that the student actually needs.
For anyone considering when to conduct AOW training, the answer is simple: decide what you need to achieve and find a motivated instructor with the flexibility to provide exactly that.
Honestly, I do wish that PADI would scrap the existing AOW course. The syllabus and standards, on paper, fulfill neither of the purposes outlined above; and any satisfaction or goal achievement derived from the training stems only from the motivation and flexibility of the individual instructor. That's generally a rare thing: not many instructors have the instructional expertise, experience, motivation or professional freedom to tailor AOW to achieve individual student goals.
PADI courses aren't supposed to be reliant on instructor interpretation, flexible application or teaching beyond the written standards: they should be of a common standard and applied similarly across the globe to meet a singular and specific training goal.
I don't see why PADI et al couldn't offer a more developmental, skill-based, course/s as a progression from OW level. The 'adventure dive' experiential program could still exist - as a cheap sampler of specialty activities; but it wouldn't form the basis of a course; especially as that course is a prerequisite necessity for access to subsequent training (a form of blackmail, really).
IMHO, there should be a course that refined and developed fundamental skills... and a course that developed a higher level of skills for more advanced diving; leading to
real training for deeper dives, currents, low viz/night, DSMB use, pony cylinders etc etc..training that'd provide a real prerequisite for specialist stuff like deep, wreck and cavern diving.
In short, an Open Water #2 course and an 'Advanced Recreational Diver' course.
I'd suggest that the AOW course is only 'popular' (i.e. profitable) because students are
forced to do it if they want to develop their diving to higher levels. If that prerequisite status was removed, I'd expect that interest in the course would plummet. More so if actual skill-based, developmental alternatives were offered.