Probably the ditch, on a bike.
Really? You think 1x energy impact is worse than 2x energy impact? You think an indirect impact (ditch) is worse than direct opposition impact?
Weird physics in your world...
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Probably the ditch, on a bike.
No, they're both the same. Except that on a bike, you don't have a chassis and neither an airbag protecting you.Really? You think 1x energy impact is worse than 2x energy impact? You think an indirect impact (ditch) is worse than direct opposition impact?
Weird physics in your world...
No, they're both the same. Except that on a bike, you don't have a chassis and neither an airbag protecting you.
The "2x impact energy force" on head-on collisions is a myth.
It depends on the momentum of both objects involved. and momentum is the product of speed and mass (weight).The #$*¥% that jumped into my lane at @30, while I was going the same, certainly magnified the impact WAY beyond my hitting something at just 30.
I have now done both. The head on was 2X, or close enough.
It depends on the momentum of both objects involved. and momentum is the product of speed and mass (weight).
If you have two cars hitting each other head-on, with both cars being roughly the same weight and going at roughly the same speed, then what you get is double the total energy being put into the collision, but this total energy is equally divided among both cars involved, so each car receives the same amount of energy as going into a stationary wall.
If either mass or speed (or both) of either object is different from the other one, then the distribution of the total energy will be uneven between the objects.
In other words, if you're in a car and you head-on against a much larger and heavier truck, then you're off worse than going against a stationary wall, while the truck is off better.
Same applies if you're on a bike and go head-on against a car. You'll receive the energy of your own momentum and most of the other car's momentum. But for two equally sized cars going at the same speed, the difference cancels out.
[video=youtube;r8E5dUnLmh4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8E5dUnLmh4[/video]
And now, please back to the topic of the thread.
The problem is that when riding a motorcycle, in at accident it falls out of the equation as it doesn't protect your body from impact. So the only mass left is yourself. There's hardly any competition against any other vehicle on the road. Which is why a head-on in a car is safer.I was not in a car, and on motorcycles our masses are seldom anywhere near equal. That is a risk one should accept if you are going to share the road with two ton cages, while riding an 800 pound bike.
The problem is that when riding a motorcycle, in at accident it falls out of the equation as it doesn't protect your body from impact. So the only mass left is yourself. There's hardly any competition against any other vehicle on the road. Which is why a head-on in a car is safer.