Viz'art
Contributor
I'll weigh in here, yes I too am a Nauticam dealer, but I think the Aquatica lacks in several areas.
One is the closure. Aquatica is still using flip latches. I don't like them for a variety of reasons; alignment, weight, awkwardness on the housing. Nauticam uses an easy cam lock.
Weight and size. Nauticam is better in both areas.
Locking Ports, ergonomics, visual and audible flood alarm, gearing, quality of construction. Nauticam is simply better.
Jean, that dealer you refer to in Vancouver, Canada is NOT a NauticamUSA dealer. He is an Aquatica dealer and is very, well, active on EBay selling all sorts of items besides UW photo equipment. He may get Nauticam product grey market, but you will not get North American support. Nor probably the most knowledgeable dealer.
BTW; I recently tried out a demo macro port and Alpha 35mm lens with an adapter on the Nauticam Nex5. Verdict is that the AF just doesn't work, slow to the point of being worthless.
The flat port with macro diopter holder is the best idea right now, until a macro lens is released.
Jack
Jack, I am not here to pick a fight with anybody, just like it when things are clear, thats all.
If you feel you need to downsize the other products in order to promote the ones you sell, then IMO you have a very poor sense of marketing. I personally think the Nauticam products are, like our Aquatica ones, very well made, we both bring a different approach to the same mission and use different techniques, material and methods to do so.
You seem eager to criticize the Aquatica on some issue, to which I will respond (and please do not interpret this as an attack on the Nauticam, I am sure Chris Parsons will understand my stand here)
The latches we use, we have been using for 30 years now, not only by us, but by many other long established manufacturers of camera and video housing, u/w scooters, life support system and a slew of other military approved products, you would think that maybe, just maybe, by now, we would know what works and what does not, no?
Size and weight... Ours is calculated with the built in optical connector attached, (as in not an attachment supplied separately), I fail to see your point here as to who is better in this area, given that the Aquatica is smaller in actual size but higher because of the included strobe connectors.
Weight wise, the Aquatica is 225gr heavier (again including optical connectors)
We have locking ports, actually had them for longer than Nauticam has been around as a company, I am sure that by now it was common knowledge to everybody (but just in case, you can check our website, for more detail),
Our moisture alarm has always had visual and audible warnings (I dont see the big deal here, most do anyway, not a sale point unless you are trying to insinuate that ours dont, again check our website for info),
Gears, what about gears??? None of our gears require the user to modify, alter or remove the rubber zoom ring, is that a sin, that we made them user friendly???
Quality of construction? The Aquatica is irreproachable, we are not only happy to anodize our housings, but we go one step further and add an extra layer of protection in the form of a powder coat that is certified to ASTM D2794 specification, we know what unprotected anodized look like after a few years in a salt environment, its not pretty.
The Dealer in Vancouver (Mozaik to name him) is a genuine Nauticam dealer, who buys his housing from Chris Parsons (for whom I have a great respect as an industry member BTW), Chris will surely confirm that for you, so much for not having North American support and so much about who is being knowledgeable dealer here. If this dealer wishes to broaden his reach by using e-bay, I fail to see what would be making him a less educated person because you do not wish to do the same. That comment, make that the whole paragraph, is loaded with derogative innuendo. He is not this and may this and may that... Facts, Jack, facts, not supposition. Sorry, but, not your shiniest moment Im afraid.