treywilly
Contributor
doing !!
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I'm late to the party and I haven't the experience to back up my opinion, but FWIW I would dive the richer mix on the deeper dive (up to appropriate PO2 limits et cetera). My reasoning has nothing to do with the accumulation of nitrogen in the tissues during the dive itself, rather it's a question of having a slightly better gas gradient when ascending from depth. I'm going to do more ascending and reducing more ambient pressure on the deeper dive, so adding in an improved gradient is going to give me more than using nitrox on a dive with very little deco.
Assuming I stay within minimum deco limits (and I have no business doing anything else), I am going to be doing stops from 30' on a shallow dive and from 50% of average depth on a deeper dive. Perhaps from 50'. So on the deeper dive I'm going to be spending at least 66% more time decompressing, so I'm going to pull a figure out of my a-- and say I'll get 66% more benefit diving Nitrox on the deeper dive.
Okay, I know this is just conjecture, but this is my thinking.
...well, in Cozumel, when I dove with Liquid Blue ( a high-end advanced diver oriented dive op), the custom for a 2-tank outing was EAN 32 for the first/deeper dive...and EAN 36 for the 2nd, shallower dive.....I 'logic' being, no reverse profiles and reduced risk of violating a mixes MOD.
To me, however, the question is somewhat moot. If I'm heading out for two dives, I'm going to be diving the same gas on both dives. It just makes logistics a whole lot easier, and it minimizes the risk of grabbing the wrong tank for a deeper dive.
I'll keep that in mind next month when I'm doing a 165' dive followed by an 85' dive.