Odd,... Since it has been shown that nearly all rebreather fatalities have been shown to be the result of operator error, not machine design, whether, because of being a inexperienced or careless or such. Good training & having the discipline to follow accepted checklists would go a massive way in minimizing risks. For that rebreather to have been in the shape it was in for the accident to occur, there just about had to be red flags that were not noticed or ignored when/ if the pre- dive checks were done.
You are applying reverse logic.
It is the equipment who is supposed to protect the operator and not the operator to protect himself/herself from the equipment.
You have a metalworker that cuts or welds metal and he makes a mistake and cuts off his arm and burns off his leg.
If the equipment was not designed to protect the metalworker from what is unavoidable - that is human error - then the equipment is at fault.
Rebreathers are classed as "Personal Protective Equipment."
To the extent that it is practicable, the equipment is to be designed to protect the user from all hazards, including human error.
This does not mean making the equipment 100% idiot proof and/or 100% dependable (it would be too costly and impractical), but it should incorporate all those little engineering features and designs which reduce risk - including that of human error.
In this instance, according to the Coroner report and HSL the equipment did not meet one of those same safety features which collectively the rebreather industry had unilaterally decided it should instead meet to protect the user from death due to user assembly error.
She did her 5 minute pre-preathe as prescribed by the manufacturer and training agency and
two buddy rebreather divers spotted nothing wrong (and could not save her).
Food for thought!