Rescue of an Unconscious Diver Underwater

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

IDCBali

Registered
Messages
20
Reaction score
4
Location
Bali
# of dives
5000 - ∞
If a diver falls unconscious and the regulator falls out of his or her mouth, it should not be replaced because by manipulating the person’s airway, there will be a risk of water entering in. There is an exception though, if the dive was in a cave or under ice, then it will need to be purged first and then replaced. In the event that the regulator did not fall off them, it should be left in place and everything done to keep it there.

scuba_diving_internships_divemaster_instructor_bali_36.png


If the person is undergoing a seizure and is in the clonic phase with the muscles relaxing and contracting, and the regulator has fallen out of the person’s mouth, then you should do your best to get the person up to the surface as soon as possible. If the mouthpiece is still in place, then you need to keep it there and then seal the person’s lips around it until the seizure has passed. Then you can take the victim to the surface. All of this is done in order to prevent the person from inhaling water once the clonic phase is passed and the person begins to breathe deeply.

Taking the Person to the Surface
As the gas in the unconscious victim’s lungs begins to expand, it will look for an avenue of escape. That is why it is important to ensure that the victim’s head remains in a neutral position when the victim is unconscious. During the ascent, it is not recommended that you carry out any chest compressions. The primary focus should be on buoyancy control, keeping the mouthpiece of the regulator in place and properly positioning the victim’s head.

Procedures on the Surface
At the surface, you need to check if the person is still breathing. If not, you should deliver rescue breaths immediately. If the person is breathing not delivering the rescue breaths will likely not harm him, but if the person is not breathing, then not delivering the breaths could lead to plenty of harm.

Delivering rescue breaths to the victim when he or she is in deep water is endorsed, however, how efficient the breaths are will depend on the training of the rescuer as well as how often he or she practices their technique. In fact, evidence suggests that giving these rescue breaths underwater can help prevent a cardiac arrest.

Conclusion
Even though these recommendations have been made by the committee based on the evidence available, the successful execution of the same is dependent on the abilities and training of the rescuing diver. If the rescuer feels that the situation will cause him significant harm, then he or she is free to opt out of harm’s way.

Dive safely and risk management is what every diver should aim to do whether for recreational or professional. Consider a diving professoinal will definitely help one diver to earn more experience and knowledge in these areas. Sign up for PADI Divemaster course today and advance your dive skills today!

Source: IDC Bali Internship - Blue season
 
Why would you replace a reg in a cave or ice diving environment but not OW?
 
f a diver falls unconscious and the regulator falls out of his or her mouth, it should not be replaced because by manipulating the person’s airway, there will be a risk of water entering in.

And if the reg is not replaced, there is an even bigger probability of water entering and 100% chance that no air will enter the lungs. Really not following the logic here.
 
For your information....

IDCBali has started posting articles like this on a regular basis. Don't bother responding. They do not participate after posting the article. They just come back when they are ready for the next article. It is a form of advertising for their operation.

The last one they published was seriously flawed in the opinion of most of the responders. I personally thought the information was shockingly incorrect and showed a stunning lack of knowledge on the part of the operation. Of course, since they did not participate in the discussion after publishing the seriously flawed article, they almost certainly never knew anyone had criticized it and did not respond. There is no point in arguing with them on anything they say--they won''t even know you argued.

The purpose of their articles is to attract people to their instructor development program. Anyone who is interested in an instructor development program should give this some careful thought.
 
For your information....

IDCBali has started posting articles like this on a regular basis. Don't bother responding. They do not participate after posting the article. They just come back when they are ready for the next article. It is a form of advertising for their operation.

The last one they published was seriously flawed in the opinion of most of the responders. I personally thought the information was shockingly incorrect and showed a stunning lack of knowledge on the part of the operation. Of course, since they did not participate in the discussion after publishing the seriously flawed article, they almost certainly never knew anyone had criticized it and did not respond. There is no point in arguing with them on anything they say--they won''t even know you argued.

The purpose of their articles is to attract people to their instructor development program. Anyone who is interested in an instructor development program should give this some careful thought.
so please stop them from posting?
 
It is not a violation of our terms of service to post inaccurate information and then not participate again.

I didn't realize that they never responded.

In the SB Terms of Service (ToS), it notes: "Our focus is to advance safety, knowledge and enjoyment within the diving community by encouraging the mutual exchange of experiences, ideas and opinions". Therefore, a case could be made to update the ToS noting that a persistent pattern of original posts without any additional participation is considered spam and will not be tolerated.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/swift/

Back
Top Bottom