Strange Feeling in One Ear

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

giles45shop

Contributor
Messages
392
Reaction score
15
Location
Odessa, FL
# of dives
200 - 499
All,

I've been having a strange feeling in my left ear for a couple months. I'm not sure how to describe it, it's not really a pain, but just sometimes feels like there's a "fullness" there and sometimes when the wind blows it feels different in one ear than the other. It doesn't seem to afffect hearing.

I went to my regular doctor and they looked in there and didn't see any redness or swelling or noticeable fluid, but when they used the little instrument that puts a puff of air in the ear she said that the left ear drum didn't have the same response that the right ear did. She thought there might be some kinking of the eustachian tube (or something like that??). She put me on Allegra and Nasonex for a week to try and clear it up. That didn't seem to make a big difference, so I'm going to go to an ENT to check it out.

The strange thing is that I'm not sure what caused it and it hasn't seemed to affect my diving. I can still clear my ears just fine and I've been on a couple shallow (15-20 ft) dives since I've noticed this with no affects.

Any advice and/or recommendations on ENT's in the Tampa Bay area would be appreciated. I know DAN could provide referrals, but I'm not a member yet.

Thanks,

John
 
John,
Imbalance in the ears with dysfunction is affected by physiology. Note in your experience that the anatomy has been examined. Nothing too abnormal noted.

The body does not require drugs for nutrition. The drugs artificially create a temporary change. The drugs wear off, the problem returns.

Go find out how well your cervical spine is working. The upper cervical spine influences the nervous system, which influences the inner ear. Also, the lower cervial spine affects the nerves that affect the muscles of the neck. When you put that together, it all affects your inner ears.

Dysfunction of vertebrae adversely affect nervous system, which then adversely affects the whole body.

Vertebral dysfunction is a fundamental component in most inner ear disorders.

page.crow DC







giles45shop:
All,

I've been having a strange feeling in my left ear for a couple months. I'm not sure how to describe it, it's not really a pain, but just sometimes feels like there's a "fullness" there and sometimes when the wind blows it feels different in one ear than the other. It doesn't seem to afffect hearing.

I went to my regular doctor and they looked in there and didn't see any redness or swelling or noticeable fluid, but when they used the little instrument that puts a puff of air in the ear she said that the left ear drum didn't have the same response that the right ear did. She thought there might be some kinking of the eustachian tube (or something like that??). She put me on Allegra and Nasonex for a week to try and clear it up. That didn't seem to make a big difference, so I'm going to go to an ENT to check it out.

The strange thing is that I'm not sure what caused it and it hasn't seemed to affect my diving. I can still clear my ears just fine and I've been on a couple shallow (15-20 ft) dives since I've noticed this with no affects.

Any advice and/or recommendations on ENT's in the Tampa Bay area would be appreciated. I know DAN could provide referrals, but I'm not a member yet.

Thanks,

John
 
Dan will usually provide referrals whether you are a member or not. Please follow through with this ASAP. GO SEE AN ENT!!!
 
page.crow:
John,
Imbalance in the ears with dysfunction is affected by physiology. Note in your experience that the anatomy has been examined. Nothing too abnormal noted.

The body does not require drugs for nutrition. The drugs artificially create a temporary change. The drugs wear off, the problem returns.

Go find out how well your cervical spine is working. The upper cervical spine influences the nervous system, which influences the inner ear. Also, the lower cervial spine affects the nerves that affect the muscles of the neck. When you put that together, it all affects your inner ears.

Dysfunction of vertebrae adversely affect nervous system, which then adversely affects the whole body.

Vertebral dysfunction is a fundamental component in most inner ear disorders.

page.crow DC

Page.crow,

With all due respect, when you hear hoof-beats, you don't think of a herd of zebras!

With the stated symptoms, you do not first start looking for vertebral dysfunction. Giles45shop may not have needed the medication prescribed but that determination is a result of our best 20/20 hindsight. The medications most probably did no harm other than extend the time before going to an ENT for evaluation.

Had this actually been a garden variety middle ear congestion then the prescribed may very well have worked and the success would have been neither temporary or artificial. You are making the contrary statement without any benefit of a physical exam performed by you on this particular person.

According to what you wrote, this problem is nutritional ("The body does not require drugs for nutrition"). Give me a break! You cannot know that as of yet. The implication of such a statement is at best unethical. Are all readers of such a statement who have hearing problems supposed to assume that they have a nutritional problem and that a change in their diet will cure them?

You also wrote, "Imbalance in the ears with dysfunction is affected by physiology. Note in your experience that the anatomy has been examined. Nothing too abnormal noted." I beg to differ with you. Giles45shop very clearly wrote, "when they used the little instrument that puts a puff of air in the ear she said that the left ear drum didn't have the same response that the right ear did." This is a finding that suggests that something is not right...most likely in the middle ear. The medication prescribed was most likely appropriate for the findings at the time of this very real exam.

Had this diver first gone to the chiropractor, the same or longer delay would have occurred. If the problem was truly minor and temporary, then this delay for spinal manipulation might well have been given credit for a "cure".

Giles45shop presents with potential hearing loss symptoms and has already delayed diagnostic and any definative treatment.

I most heartily agree with NetDoc...Go see the ENT, now. Don't see the chiropractor for spinal manipulation or the the dentist for TMJ treatment. That is where you go if the problem is determined to fall into their areas of expertise. Audiometry and other specialized testing may be required to properly diagnose this condition. This is what you do first.

Laurence Stein DDS
 
giles45shop:
All,

I've been having a strange feeling in my left ear for a couple months. I'm not sure how to describe it, it's not really a pain, but just sometimes feels like there's a "fullness" there and sometimes when the wind blows it feels different in one ear than the other. It doesn't seem to afffect hearing.

I went to my regular doctor and they looked in there and didn't see any redness or swelling or noticeable fluid, but when they used the little instrument that puts a puff of air in the ear she said that the left ear drum didn't have the same response that the right ear did. She thought there might be some kinking of the eustachian tube (or something like that??). She put me on Allegra and Nasonex for a week to try and clear it up. That didn't seem to make a big difference, so I'm going to go to an ENT to check it out.

The strange thing is that I'm not sure what caused it and it hasn't seemed to affect my diving. I can still clear my ears just fine and I've been on a couple shallow (15-20 ft) dives since I've noticed this with no affects.

Any advice and/or recommendations on ENT's in the Tampa Bay area would be appreciated. I know DAN could provide referrals, but I'm not a member yet.

Thanks,

John

The abnormal exam is likely a tympanic mobility test, its qualitative and subjective and usually done because its a low-tech quick way to ascertain if the ear organs are working. This test should also be accompanied by tuning fork hearing tests, which is qualitative too. At the ENT, both tests are quantified as typanometry and audiometry.

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003390.htm

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003341.htm


All this assumes the test was done properly, and the reason for the abnormalities was not due to a problem in the performed test, not the response of the patient. Both tests together will point to where the problem lies, a more difficult item is treatment.

Seeing an ENT doc is your best bet, I sincerely doubt, in full support of Dr Stein's analysis, that there is a spinal or nutritional issue.
 
Dr. Stein,
Thanks for your comments.

We have a difference of opinions in how to treat inner ear disorders. Your perspective is medical. Mine is chiropractic. I understand you are a dentist, a specialist of teeth. I am a specialist of the spine, articular joints and the nervous system. I also teach natural health care and non-medical\non-drug\surgical avoidence techniques. Additionally, I'm certified in acupuncture for musculoskeletal\nervous system related disorders.

Allow me to respond to your remarks, one point at a time:

I ALWAYS start by looking for vertebral dysfunction in a patient when they present with symptoms. In this example-giles45shop reports "fullness there" and "when the wind blows it feels different in one ear than the other..." We chiros look at this as imbalance and blockage in the inner ear. Could have many causes. Could be pathologic by now and in need of an EENT. Certainly we all know to refer to an EENT when necessary. In chiropractic, we find MANY\MOST pts demonstrate vertebral subluxation complex with resultant nervous pathology. This leads to inner ear dysfunction, blockage, nerve immflamation, muscle spasm, and many other symptoms in inner ear. In our practice, it is a common result to achieve relief of symptoms in the inner ear and quick resolution of imbalance WHEN the CAUSE is subluxation.

It's important to say this about patients: Patients usually go to several doctors looking for help and answers at the same time. They will go to their medical doctor. He will recommend an EENT. Many will also go to a chiropractor. Patients often seek several professionals for help. We get this all the time. A professional chiropractor will always make recommendations to the specialist EENT for their expertise. Nobody can see inside an ear and do cooler things surgically When this is needed. We chiros don't try to relpace other docs. We do our thing, which is commonly misunderstood and overlooked by medics and dentists.

Regarding medications: This chiropractors opinion of meds is that they are over-utilized. Some have their place. Taking antibiotics to clear inner ear infections often results in having to do it over and over and over again. Then there is the the toxicity issues and such. If the imbalance and blockage is caused by physiology problems, then drugs are not the cure, but buy you some time, and worse, injure the patient. We chiros treat the cause of many inner ear dysfunctions, by correcting vertebral\nervous system disorders.

Regarding nutrition: I was utilizing a metaphor. It was not understood, certainly. Allow me to clarify. The human body, when functioning normally, does not require or want petrochemical drugs in it. They have no <nutritional> purpose. I can only speak for myself, but most chiropractors recommend a drug free and that also means pharmaceutcial drug free...body. I look around me and see people whose bodies are REALLY out of balance, using these drugs. And I don't see them getting better. When the drug wears off...

But back to nutrition and the ears. YES! Some people's ears are full because of poor nutrition and poor health. Bacterial infections, yeast infections, excess sebum, thick ropy mucous, etc. Often what people eat affects their immune system and health, as well as what their body puts off.

Regarding the exam and the "puff" air put into ear. The difference in response mentioned is certainly an exam finding. Cool. A noted imbalance. An objective confirmation of what the patient already told us. It's not rocket science.

Dr. Stein-you said "Had this diver gone to the chiropractor...a longer delay would have occurred." Perhaps not. I suggest a different outcome-the result we are used to getting repeatedly in this office. I suggest the outcome where the patient gets better, the fullness imbalance goes away, and the problem doesn't keep coming back. Patients also come in to this office with ear pain, ear equalization disorder, ringing in the ears, imbalance disorders, poor hearing, etc. Many and most of those people get results too. Its just what happens. Not everyone gets better, but most do. Some need to move on to an EENT and we refer when necessary.

Oh...BTW Dr. Stein-regarding that TMJ disorder condition you talked about. Some of us chiros work on that too with great result. Dysfunction in the TMJ joint and subluxation in the upper cervical spine have a great effect on inner ear. I have many patients that we work on to resolve and manage TMJ disorder.

Nice thread Dr. Stein. Thanks for your involvement.

Page Crow DC










Laurence Stein DDS:
Page.crow,

With all due respect, when you hear hoof-beats, you don't think of a herd of zebras!

With the stated symptoms, you do not first start looking for vertebral dysfunction. Giles45shop may not have needed the medication prescribed but that determination is a result of our best 20/20 hindsight. The medications most probably did no harm other than extend the time before going to an ENT for evaluation.

Had this actually been a garden variety middle ear congestion then the prescribed may very well have worked and the success would have been neither temporary or artificial. You are making the contrary statement without any benefit of a physical exam performed by you on this particular person.

According to what you wrote, this problem is nutritional ("The body does not require drugs for nutrition"). Give me a break! You cannot know that as of yet. The implication of such a statement is at best unethical. Are all readers of such a statement who have hearing problems supposed to assume that they have a nutritional problem and that a change in their diet will cure them?

You also wrote, "Imbalance in the ears with dysfunction is affected by physiology. Note in your experience that the anatomy has been examined. Nothing too abnormal noted." I beg to differ with you. Giles45shop very clearly wrote, "when they used the little instrument that puts a puff of air in the ear she said that the left ear drum didn't have the same response that the right ear did." This is a finding that suggests that something is not right...most likely in the middle ear. The medication prescribed was most likely appropriate for the findings at the time of this very real exam.

Had this diver first gone to the chiropractor, the same or longer delay would have occurred. If the problem was truly minor and temporary, then this delay for spinal manipulation might well have been given credit for a "cure".

Giles45shop presents with potential hearing loss symptoms and has already delayed diagnostic and any definative treatment.

I most heartily agree with NetDoc...Go see the ENT, now. Don't see the chiropractor for spinal manipulation or the the dentist for TMJ treatment. That is where you go if the problem is determined to fall into their areas of expertise. Audiometry and other specialized testing may be required to properly diagnose this condition. This is what you do first.

Laurence Stein DDS
 
All,

Thanks for your inputs! I hadn't gotten any reponses, so I had kind of forgotten about the post. I made an appointment with an ENT a few days after posting, but as a new patient this first available appointment was 2/17. Just to close the loop I'll post the diagnosis after the visit.

Thanks,

John
 
Dear Dr. Crow:

Almost a year-and-a-half ago now, you started a thread here on Scubaboard titled “bone setting to improve equilization disorders” where you claimed:

page.crow:
Cervical spine manipulation (chiropractic adjustments) can be utilized to dramatically improve equalization disorders.

Vertebral manipulation (chiropractic adjustments) have been proven (*emphasis added*) very effective for inner ear disorders (fluid congestion, earache, imbalance, vertigo).

That was a very interesting claim in and of itself, but you went on in the next line to state that:

page.crow:
The research regarding this subject has been properly done, valid, and repeatable.

(See: http://www.scubaboard.com/showthread.php?t=38067&page=1&pp=10 )

As I’m sure that you are aware, part of doing “valid and repeatable” research “properly” involves making the results of that research available to others- generally by publishing the research in a peer-reviewed scientific journal- so that other researchers can examine the “validity” and “repeatability” of the results, and so that others can benefit from the research.

To refresh your memory in case you’ve forgotten, you may recall that when you were asked in that thread to provide the “properly done, valid, and repeatable” research that you claim, you gave us some anecdotal reports from your own personal experience (very interesting, but hardly “properly done, valid, and repeatable” research), you told us to search the “Chirolars” chiropractic search engine for ourselves- a search engine that is not available to the general public best I can tell (but is presumably available to you since you referred us to it), you suggested that we travel to one of the 19 or so chiropractic schools in the US to look up the information on our own, and you gave us links to websites that were either invalid or linked to irrelevant chiropractic marketing sites that had no information to support your claims.

Finally, and most interesting of all, you might recall that you referred us to the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics- a peer reviewed scientific journal run by chiropractors and sponsored by the National College of Chiropractic. When I searched this journal (abstracts from which are available to the general public), I was able to find only one article even remotely relevant to your claims. That article- in your own reference source- not only didn’t support your claims of “properly done, valid, and repeatable” research, it actually seemed to refute your claims of available research. (See: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...ve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10395431&dopt=Abstract )

When I pointed these problems out to you and asked for you to provide the “properly done, valid, and repeatable” research that you claimed, you said that you “couldn’t wait to get back to” me, but that you were too busy rebuilding a hot-rod engine to take the trouble to back up your statement with evidence, and you promised to get back to me “later”. Well, it’s been nearly a year-and-a-half now. Seems to me to be time enough to track down the research you claim, or perhaps even to publish your own “properly done, valid, and repeatable” research if you have it. Can we see what you have now please? I would very much like to see it.

Thanks,

Bill
 
I fully support BillP and Larry Stein's position. I would not want the discussion to deteriorate into the methodologic and philosophical differences of chiropractic versus conventional medicine, so readers can make up their minds over the discussion here. Partly because of such differences, its uncommon to find chiropractic studies in the rigor we expect in conventional community, so caveat emptor.
 
Saturation:
I fully support BillP and Larry Stein's position.

Thanks Saturation, but I just want to be clear that the only "position" that I am taking is that if someone is going to claim that something is "proven" by "properly done, valid, and repeatable" research, they need to be prepared to back their claims up with very sound evidence.
 

Back
Top Bottom