Suunto Reliability

How reliable is your Suunto?

  • My Vytec has needed repair under warranty

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • My Vytec has been Bullet Proof

    Votes: 18 36.7%
  • My Vyper has needed repair under warranty

    Votes: 1 2.0%
  • My Vyper has been Bullet Proof

    Votes: 28 57.1%
  • My Gekko has needed repair under warranty

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • My Gekko has been Bullet Proof

    Votes: 2 4.1%

  • Total voters
    49
  • Poll closed .

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Same Vyper for 3 years now, approx 350 dives- it's close to needing a new battery, therefor I am carrying the replacement battery kit around with me, but absolutely no problems with it.
 
Between my wife and I we have one Mosquito and three TUSA IQ-400s (Suunto Favor), all have been bullet proof.

Ralph
 
Looks like we made a good decision going with Suunto!
 
On a stinger now, had a solution alpha for around 50 dives, then a Spyder that lasted for just over 400. Spyder pressure sensor has got a bit dubious showing me at surface during a 5m stop, however the cost of sending it back for a service and its age made me buy a stinger and keep the spyder as back up. No complaints total over 500 dives on Suunto's, the g/f has a Stinger which has gone through about 400 dives too.
 
136 dives last year on my Cobra and no problems yet, battery still showing full capacity
 
My wife and I both dive with Vypers. No problems at all. Love'm
 
I have the Cobra. I am a new diver and have only done 6 dives with it but it is fantastic! Do you feel the need to use a backup computer or gauges. Mine is air integrated so if my computer failed I would have no way of knowing how much air I've used.
 
Im of the opinion EVERYONE should carry a backup depth gauge, spg and timing device in case a computer dies.

Never trust a single non redundant piece of equipment as your only means of safety.
 
String:
Im of the opinion EVERYONE should carry a backup depth gauge, spg and timing device in case a computer dies.

Never trust a single non redundant piece of equipment as your only means of safety.

I agree with the redundant depth gauge because you might need to do stops and the timing device for the same reason, but an extra spg?
I would agree that if your main air monitor is AI then you should have a mechanical backup, but if your main air monitor is already mechanical then not many people go for redundancy.
 
Thats what i meant but worded badly. I was thinking AI computer with no analogue backup.

I only dive with 1 x analogue SPG, if that fails its dive over immediately.

I have absolutely no evidence to prove it but theres something in my mind thinking an analogue spring based SPG should in theory be more reliable than a microprocessor.
Thats just my thought though, as i said, i have no evidence to support that. Dive computer reliability these days is extremely good.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/swift/

Back
Top Bottom