I didn't ask about the $35 shafts, I asked about the $25 shafts. I was hoping to get a better answer than "a guy", can you be more specific? Since you can't and won't (I have asked you before) post any pictures of all the big fish you have shot in your short-lived spearfishing career, perhaps you can post pictures of these amazing shafts?
How are you going to get better (longer) range without adding power? I'll answer that... you can't. It's simple conservation of momentum, the only way to increase momentum is to increase velocity (assuming the mass of the spear is held constant). The only way to increase velocity (which will be a function of acceleration) is to get a bigger gun, add more bands, or increase the power of the bands.
Here is a picture of my wife's "hole" gun, I'll post a picture of my Kitto later (I only bring her Riffe to work- I can use it as a jackhammer underwater in case of emergency). It's powered by 3 of Mori's 15mm "Mean Green" bands that are extreme mod, which means it is the equivalent of Riffe or Spearfishing Specailties high mod 3/4'' diameter bands.
My point is there is absolutely no way in hell that a freeshaft gun (a similar size of course) is going to have a longer range than a line gun with a lot more power. With the gun above I have effectively increased the range by about 3 feet (would be more if the gun was bigger). Furthermore, you would not want that kind of power on a freeshaft gun because this gun will string reef fish.
Accuracy is a function of band stretch, band modulous, band diameter, shaft diameter, shaft length, shaft design, tip design, and balancing. On guns I shoot the coefficient of friction for monofilament in water is negligable considering the order of magnitude of all the dynamics involved. On some guns it may not be so negligable.
Are there any physics/mechanics to back-up Clownson's hypothesis? Please share... and don't forget about the awesome $25 spear connection too.
Regards,
Chris