Firebrand
Contributor
I think with the limited visibility underwater, and the fact that sounds can be heard, but direction can't be established, we are lead to use touch as the next best means of gaining knowledge through our senses. We certainly can't taste everything underwater and our sense of smell is virtually non-existant. This leaves our sense of touch as the second most productive form of gaining knowleged. Sometimes in extremely low/no visibility, it is our primary sense of gaining knowledge. I understand the urge, but it may not always be the most beneficial to us, or the creatures we are touching. If the animal approaches you, it probably wants interaction. Poking something is not the right way to go about it.
On the topside, if a deer approached me, I probably would reach out to it, but if I saw a bear, I wouldn't touch it, or even consider poking it. Why do the same with creatures that can be aggessive (like a morray eel)? Maybe next time he should reach out and pet that baracuda on the dive site, especially with gloves off and some bright, shiny rings on his fingers!
On the topside, if a deer approached me, I probably would reach out to it, but if I saw a bear, I wouldn't touch it, or even consider poking it. Why do the same with creatures that can be aggessive (like a morray eel)? Maybe next time he should reach out and pet that baracuda on the dive site, especially with gloves off and some bright, shiny rings on his fingers!