DevonDiver
N/A
(Please note - poll is for Technical Divers ONLY)
In-Water Recompression (IWR).
A point was raised on another thread that the 2008 DAN Report stated that;
How popular has IWR become amongst the technical diving community?
Do any SB members have personal experience of this?
Or know other technical divers who have attempted this?
If it has been attempted, was it improvised or was it part of pre-arranged contingency plans?
It is something I have heard debated many times, but I believed to be unworkable without considerable logistics and pre-planning. I am not personally aware of anyone having attempted IWR.
In-Water Recompression (IWR).
A point was raised on another thread that the 2008 DAN Report stated that;
My questions are:There were at least 40 calls by technical divers having some type of symptoms.... Some callers in this group called after their self-treatment, either with FAO2 (n=8, 20%) or IWR (n=3, 7.5%) failed.....The extensive use of FAO2 and occasional use of IWR by technical divers may partially explain the apparently low incidence of DCS in this group when judged according to numbers reported by recompression chambers.
How popular has IWR become amongst the technical diving community?
Do any SB members have personal experience of this?
Or know other technical divers who have attempted this?
If it has been attempted, was it improvised or was it part of pre-arranged contingency plans?
It is something I have heard debated many times, but I believed to be unworkable without considerable logistics and pre-planning. I am not personally aware of anyone having attempted IWR.
(The poll allows multiple answers)
Please note - this is not a debate on the pros and cons of IWR (that is currently happening on two different threads HERE and HERE).
Please note - this is not a debate on the pros and cons of IWR (that is currently happening on two different threads HERE and HERE).
I just want to know technical diver's personal or first-hand (not ancedotal) experiences of IWR. There is a difference between a direct first hand account and an ancedotal story. Please PM me with any off-topic points about my research methods, poll structure etc etc etc.... posting them here dilutes and deviates the thread.
Definitions:
Failure = persistance of symptoms after treatment. Incomplete resolution.
Omitted Deco = Conducted before presentation of DCI symptoms, to specifically remedy a deviation from the planned deco schedule.
IWR = Conducted after presentation of DCI symptoms, to specifically treat DCI.
My definition of 'failure' comes from the wording of the 2008 DAN report, which introduced the possibility that IWR may be a 'trend' in the technical diving community...
Definitions:
Failure = persistance of symptoms after treatment. Incomplete resolution.
Omitted Deco = Conducted before presentation of DCI symptoms, to specifically remedy a deviation from the planned deco schedule.
IWR = Conducted after presentation of DCI symptoms, to specifically treat DCI.
My definition of 'failure' comes from the wording of the 2008 DAN report, which introduced the possibility that IWR may be a 'trend' in the technical diving community...
We must recognize that these calls were mostly because the attempted IWR failed. In case
the IWR were successful, diver would not have called to report the event. Thus we do not
know how often IWR may have been used successfully.
Last edited: