Do you actually see people diving with pony bottles?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Here's a picture of a 13 story building (~130ft.). The equivalent of rec depths.

I like my aluminum buddy compared to relying on an error prone human or prayer.

I've never done a CESA in a real emergency, looks like it would suck on likely empty lungs.

101polk1.jpg
 
Was on a liveaboard in the Maldives a few years back with some fellow who owns a dive shop in Florida. He kept critiquing my equipment ... completely unsolicited, of course. Told me over and over how he'd never trust his life to anything but ScubaPro.

I finally said "Of course not ... you're a ScubaPro dealer" ...

... Bob (Grateful Diver)

Did Scubapro manufacture the airliner he trusted his life to as he flew to the Maldives ?
 
... if you're going to 130 on one of those stupid oversize beer cans they make you dive with in the tropics, then I'd say you really SHOULD consider taking a redundant air source ... if anything at all goes wrong at depth, you'll likely be glad to have it ...

... Bob (Grateful Diver)

This was my thought, as well.
 
I often see divers carrying pony bottles in Lake Simcoe, Ontario where I most often dive. I do not. I figure it would add drag and a possible entanglement hazard for little gain. I'm usually no deeper than 60 or 70' and figure I could CESA that distance if I really needed to. I once had my regulator free flow, but it was shortly after descent and I was able to come back up without any real trouble. Even from depth I imagine I'd be able to breath off a free flow for enough time to get up to comfortable CESA depth if not all the way to the surface.

I sometimes dive solo, and in those cases always stay to less than 60', again with the idea that I could CESA if I had to.

One of my most regular buddies dives with a pony every dive. I think I would move to sidemount or a twin set before considering a pony for myself. This guy had someone accidentally turn off his gas before jumping off a boat negative, and that motivated him to habitually carry the pony.

I have practiced valve drills, and can turn my gas on and off while wearing either my wet or dry suit. This thread is reminding me that I'm past due practicing these again. The one time I had the free flow I turned off my gas to avoid emptying the tank, but only when I was back on the surface.
 
Can you explain how you do a CESA while entangled?
 
I often see divers carrying pony bottles in Lake Simcoe, Ontario where I most often dive. I do not. I figure it would add drag and a possible entanglement hazard for little gain. I'm usually no deeper than 60 or 70' and figure I could CESA that distance if I really needed to. I once had my regulator free flow, but it was shortly after descent and I was able to come back up without any real trouble. Even from depth I imagine I'd be able to breath off a free flow for enough time to get up to comfortable CESA depth if not all the way to the surface.

I sometimes dive solo, and in those cases always stay to less than 60', again with the idea that I could CESA if I had to.

One of my most regular buddies dives with a pony every dive. I think I would move to sidemount or a twin set before considering a pony for myself. This guy had someone accidentally turn off his gas before jumping off a boat negative, and that motivated him to habitually carry the pony.

I have practiced valve drills, and can turn my gas on and off while wearing either my wet or dry suit. This thread is reminding me that I'm past due practicing these again. The one time I had the free flow I turned off my gas to avoid emptying the tank, but only when I was back on the surface.

Just curious if you've ever actually tried a CESA from 60 feet? And have you factored in that doing a CESA during a real emergency is considerably more stressful than doing it under planned, controlled conditions? For most divers, it's not as easy as the course material makes it out to be ... in part due to the mental stress incurred in a real emergency ...

... Bob (Grateful Diver)
 
Do you see people diving with pony bottles?

I see them occasionally when people are on deeper dives. I also encounter divers who are firm believers in the buddy system, and who are concerned about the safety problems pony cylinders can cause. There was a fatality caused by a poorly configured pony bottle configuration in one diving club where I was a member for a while. Most of the members quit using pony cylinders after that.

You mean there are people who still don't dive with a pony, or another redundant source?

On most dives, the surface is my redundant air source.

Could you explain why. I use the same gas plan with or without a pony. I carry the pony as emergency bailout, not as additional back gas so I can extend the dive. Don't get me wrong, I have used a pony to extend a dive, however I was under no illusion that the pony was for safety at that point.

I don't think there's a consensus on what constitutes proper gas planning with a pony cylinder.

If I do not have a pony cylinder, I will carry enough back gas that I can complete a normal ascent while sharing air ("rock bottom") at any point in the dive. With a pony cylinder, I will relax my planning somewhat, based on me switching to the pony cylinder before the ascent.

On just a regular recreational dive in the Caribbean vacation, I would not even get on the boat if someone was going to use a pony bottle. Just a sign that I am about to dive with an incompetent. Sorry.

Perhaps you could clarify how often you've actually encountered a recreational diver using a pony cylinder, and whether you actually disembarked in response in all these cases. I would be curious whether your fees are typically refunded by the operator when this occurs.

The people I meet while diving fall into two categories:
  1. People who dive as badly as I used to at some point in the past
  2. People who dive as well as I hope to at some point in the future
The more I dive the less importance I ascribe to the relative competence of the people around me. We are all pilgrims on a journey.

I guess having been a liveaboard operator I've seen way more regulator failures than just a few. No, I've never had one fail either, and yes, I also do my own maintenance, and my wife is the repair tech at a dive shop. The junk some folks dive with would truly shock you.

I think you'll agree that redundancy is not a band-aid for unreliable gear, bad habits, or poor maintenance.

There is so much wrong with your post I'm not sure where to start. .... Thanks for the opportunity to educate you and point out the ignorance in your post that indicates that divers who use additional gear that other divers may not feel is necessary does not equate to incompetance.

I agree with the substance of what you are trying to say but do not believe that you are being an effective advocate for our shared views because you are introducing side issues that are not relevant to the discussion.

It is not my experience that divers on a boat who bring redundant gas are worse divers or less attentive buddies. I find that recent diving experience and familiarity with the gear they are diving are the two most likely markers of a capable diver. I find that presence of an agenda at odds with my own is a harbinger of a dive where my buddy may be inattentive. Macro photography is one example mentioned upthread. Exploration of portions of a wreck that I do not wish to enter would be another example.

Great practice. I’ve been in swells so high, you could not see the divers from the boat.

Perhaps we should have a contest to see who has the biggest SMB. The tricky thing with big SMBs is that it's hard to keep them inflated enough that they stay firm and vertical in the water. Then again some people have difficulty boarding unless they find a way to use the wave action to their advantage.

Because I dive with trained, tame, friendly dolphins, I shouldn't plan for a catastrophic failure of my primary gas supply? Because you disapprove of divers swimming with trained dolphins, I shouldn't extend my gas supply to enjoy an even longer interaction? You think that's all that needs to be said? Because you disapprove of a particular thing, it's not open to discussion?

Dolphin dives are controversial. Perhaps you did not know this. I agree that it has little or nothing to do with the use of pony bottles. I am surprised you brought it up in this thread.
 
Can you explain how you do a CESA while entangled?

I have a great deal of respect for you, and I have found your comments to usually be very helpful, but I'm not sure I see where you're going with this.

If I'm entangled to the point where I can't swim to the surface then I can't surface. Having a pony won't fix that, but it will give me more time to struggle. Having a buddy won't fix that, but it will give me another brain, another perspective, and hopefully non-entangled hands assuming they're not tangled in the same thing as me.

A pony bottle is another piece of gear to become entangled. So your argument is against carrying a pony?

I think you're arguing against solo diving, not against pony bottles. That's an old argument that I wouldn't want to bring into this thread. Hell I don't even want to get into it in a new thread.

For the record, I do carry two cutting tools in different locations to mitigate this risk. I also take extra care on solo dives to avoid entanglement hazards that I might risk with a buddy. My gear configuration is almost rediculously geared towards avoiding entanglement hazards, even to the point of not using boots on my tanks. I have no "danglies". So don't think that I haven't considered entanglement.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/swift/

Back
Top Bottom