I find this story and the related posts quite interesting as it raises the question of just how accurate the reports of all diving related deaths actually are. I apologise if this post is quite gruesome but I think it needs saying.
In my humble opinion the following factors mitigate against accurate reports.
1) It takes a very brave buddy indeed to admit that "I had to push my buddy away" as in this case. So often we hear that the diver simply lost sight of his buddy.
2) Certificated medical cause of death - artefactual injuries.
If a diver's body is recovered it will not be decompressed so will inevitably contain air bubbles in the circulation and possibly in the tissues as well. (This is not found in the bodies of those who have simply drowned.) So easy to conclude DCI was the cause of death.
I am not certain of this, but is seems to me that the very act of recovery may also cause barotrauma artefact. For example, the diver is hardly exhaling during the ascent, so there is the risk of a burst lung (pneumothorax) being produced post mortem during the ascent. Again this differs from simple drowning. (I have always been told that an unconcious casualty in respiratory arrest has a closed glottis, perhaps not?)
Diving medicine is a pretty specialised field. Most pathologists (medical examiners?) are not experienced in diving medicine and may not be aware that these findings may - or may not - be artefactual.
In any case I do not envy their job as I think it must be almost impossible to determine the actual cause of death in diver fatalities for these reasons alone.
I have to emphasise that I am not a pathologist and have no idea of how they go about their jobs and this is not intended as a criticism of their branch of the profession.
Perhaps a Canadian reader could ask the pathologist how he concluded the cause of death was AGE as this sounds more and more unlikely to me.
One posibility, and it is only conjecture, is simple cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation caused by the stress and biochemical imbalances. This would leave no post mortem evidence whatsoever. Is there anyone from DAN on the forum to advise?
:doctor: