What this thread really confirms, I think, is the value of technical training.
An experienced, skilled, solo qualified diver, with 200-500 dives and 4 years on this board, did something very stupid, improperly mixing up rec and tec-sourced elements in his planning, turning what would've been a safe and easy dive for a freshly minted Tec40 into something that almost belongs in Near Misses.
Throughout the dive and the discussion, he believed himself to have been very safe, and his hodge-podge of approaches to have kept him safer, rather than put him one problem away from casualty. He had everything he needed to do the dive with minimal risk - the only missing factor was the knowledge of the whys and hows of technical dive planning.
An experienced, skilled, solo qualified diver, with 200-500 dives and 4 years on this board, did something very stupid, improperly mixing up rec and tec-sourced elements in his planning, turning what would've been a safe and easy dive for a freshly minted Tec40 into something that almost belongs in Near Misses.
Throughout the dive and the discussion, he believed himself to have been very safe, and his hodge-podge of approaches to have kept him safer, rather than put him one problem away from casualty. He had everything he needed to do the dive with minimal risk - the only missing factor was the knowledge of the whys and hows of technical dive planning.