Hi all,
I'm in the market for a dive computer. I'll admit, it's my first one and I don't have a lot of experience yet, but I know where I want to go with diving, so I want a computer that is a good computer for now, but is a natural predecessor to a much more complex computer in the future.
I'll explain:
I'm fairly new to diving - ok very new to diving - but I already know that I have a future in it as a career in some capacity. I've already been doing quite a bit of research, trying to build up my knowledge base, and I'm working (slowly but surely) on gaining the practical experience underwater as well. I don't like to rush things, so I'm making sure I have more than enough comfort before I try to progress with certifications. That said, my ultimate goal (in terms of certification) is technical diving with CCR. I know it's going to take a LONG time to get to that point, but that's where I want to go.
I say that to say this: I don't want to invest in a Shearwater or something of that caliber just yet, because by the time I reach the point where I can actually use all of its functions (a few years at least, I'm sure), there will probably be a newer version or something on the market at that time, and that's what I'll want to go for then.
However, I also don't want to buy something too simple to where I have to upgrade anytime soon. I want flexibility between rec and tec, and I want something that naturally leads to my next computer. Here is what I've been looking at, and I'm open to other suggestions as well:
Bottom line, here is what I'm looking for:
Sorry for the long post. I'm obsessed with details and long-winded. Happy to read your feedback, and thanks in advance!
Joe
I'm in the market for a dive computer. I'll admit, it's my first one and I don't have a lot of experience yet, but I know where I want to go with diving, so I want a computer that is a good computer for now, but is a natural predecessor to a much more complex computer in the future.
I'll explain:
I'm fairly new to diving - ok very new to diving - but I already know that I have a future in it as a career in some capacity. I've already been doing quite a bit of research, trying to build up my knowledge base, and I'm working (slowly but surely) on gaining the practical experience underwater as well. I don't like to rush things, so I'm making sure I have more than enough comfort before I try to progress with certifications. That said, my ultimate goal (in terms of certification) is technical diving with CCR. I know it's going to take a LONG time to get to that point, but that's where I want to go.
I say that to say this: I don't want to invest in a Shearwater or something of that caliber just yet, because by the time I reach the point where I can actually use all of its functions (a few years at least, I'm sure), there will probably be a newer version or something on the market at that time, and that's what I'll want to go for then.
However, I also don't want to buy something too simple to where I have to upgrade anytime soon. I want flexibility between rec and tec, and I want something that naturally leads to my next computer. Here is what I've been looking at, and I'm open to other suggestions as well:
- Suunto Vyper NOVO: lots of different modes, can be air integrated, multi-gas compatible (I'm Nitrox certified), all around a good computer and I've seen many good reviews. The downside (depending on your point of view) is that it uses the Suunto RGBM algorithm. I understand that is pretty conservative, and for some it is much too conservative. I know that more conservative means safer, but at the same time, if I will upgrade to a more technical computer in the future that uses Buhlmann ZHL-16B (and some even include VPM-B as well), then why not go for a computer now that uses that same algorithm?
- Oceanic Geo 2.0: I've read a lot about this one as well, and it seems to be more robust, and once you get the hang of using it, it's not so complicated. It's more expensive and runs on an algorithm based on Buhlmann, but not the true Buhlmann (maybe for me that doesn't matter?).
- iDive Tech+: Right now this one is on sale for not much more than the regular retail of the Suunto Vyper NOVO, which is why I would go for it over the iDive Easy or iDive Pro. It has a lot of different features, capabilities, and can be accessorized like crazy. I like that it has its own oxygen sensor (sold separately though) that hooks straight into the computer, but I feel like a separate oxygen analyzer is always a better idea. It can go deep, even though I don't need that right now it gives me flexibility in the future. The thing I don't like about this is I've read some negative reviews about its reliability, and an unreliable computer is a huge no-no, in my opinion.
Bottom line, here is what I'm looking for:
- Ability to go deep (so that I can continue to use it throughout any rec diving, and even in the beginning of tec diving), but not necessarily more than 80 meters for now. I feel like at that point, I would want a more complex computer since that would require a much higher certification.
- Buhlmann algorithm (unless in your collective opinion this is a stupid thing to get hung up on at this point - I just like the idea of consistency from this computer to the next).
- Air, Nitrox, Trimix, and Free Dive mode (I like to free dive as well, and I would like to not have to buy a separate computer for that) - again this gives flexibility to the future, while not overloading on things that will be useless to me in the near future.
- Reasonably user friendly - I have no problem figuring out a complicated operating system, but I don't want to be focusing on that while I'm actually diving, I'd rather have something that can be navigated easily so that I can focus on the dive.
- Ability for air integration. Right now I don't really care about it that much, but in the future I might want to do that.
- Compass - I like having as much on the computer as I can have, and obviously carrying redundant analog equipment as well. I just want a compass function on the computer to make things easier underwater rather than checking multiple devices.
Sorry for the long post. I'm obsessed with details and long-winded. Happy to read your feedback, and thanks in advance!
Joe