sheck33 once bubbled...
I am in a shellsuit as well and it is not a problem, what makes this a problem for many many divers is the fact that they have too much air in their drysuits to begin with. I have never even had any tendency for an uncontrolled feet up ascent.
But again, if you have too much air in your suit it WILL be a problem. As a matter of fact the exhaust on the forearm is the better place rather then the shoulder. Too much air in the suit is very often also the reason people wear ankle weights, you dont need them, those weights 'fix' a problem that doesnt exist.
Hi Sheck33. This is Just the sort of advice I was given when I retstarted diving three year ago and used a membrane dry suit for the first time. To my mind this proves just how few divers really understand the problems associated with a (thick) pile undersuit necessary for comfort in cold waters.
My undersuit displaces nine litres of water. (I need nine more kilograms when wearing it under my membrane than if I do not.(my own experiment)). It therefore must contain nine litres of air even when I am partially "squeezed" at depth. On an ascent from 30 metres this nine litres of air expands to 36 litres so of course I have have too much air in it! (we were discussing ascents weren't we?).
This air will only vent if the dump is located above it.
I use an autodump fully open during the dive and ascent, so provided the vent is situated to the top of the "bag" it will vent automatically, maintaing the "squeezed" nine litre volume and thus constant bouyancy at all times;- even after I have injected air to reduce squeeze on the descent. After a considerable amount of trial and error I can now rotate in the horizontal position, or yaw in the vertical position, to assist dumping if necessary as this raises the dump. I see no reason to put it on my forearm (or to use a cuff dump) since this means I cannot use that arm without upsetting this finely tuned constant bouyancy control mechanism. In the erect vertical, hands down, attitude a cuff dump is well below the top of the "bag" in any case.
Apart from any other concerns I ascend face up so I can see where I am going.
As for ankle weights? Again "sisssies" only need them and as you say it is a problem that does not exist. I am afraid you are wrong again sheck33. The whole undersuit has a volume of nine litres and a good proportion of this is in the trousers. ie below the waist and below the weight belt. In the horizontal attitude there is at least 2 Kgs worth of bouyant air in the legs. Following the wellmeaning advice of experienced divers I was initailly pursuaded not to use ankle weights and found, even when squeezed, I was very, very uncomfortable with a head down attitude even when neutrally bouyant unless I corrected this by vigorous finning.
Tranferring 2 Kgs from my weight belt to my ankles corrected this.
I have found out the hard way by trail and error that there is a world of difference between bouyancy and attitude control when using a thick pile undersuit (necessary for diving in the North Sea in winter) and a wet suit, semi dry or crushed neoprene dry suit. It was like learning to ride a bicycle. I now maintain bouyancy control by means of the one item of equipment specifically designed for bouyancy control, my wing. (It starts with at least 6 litres of air which is gradually dumped as my 6 Kgs of breathing gas is used up during the dive.)
I for one fail to undertstand why some "experts" insist on using their suits for this purpose with cuff dumps as they are simply introducing a second, ever varying, source of bouyancy that is less easy to control.
All of which confirms what I said earlier. .
What is right for a Caribbean reef or wall dive may not be right for the a wreck in The North Sea or the Atlantic or Arctic Oceans, or for a quarry or a sump.
I say again. I am not for or aginst DIR, ridicule or for rigid rules misapplied but for safe diving techniques properly applied with a modicum of common sense.
We are all adults and must be allowed to make up our own minds. How I dive works for me. It may not suit everyone, or indeed any other single person.
There is no one rule that can ever apply in every single case.