Hi everyone, I've read a lot of trip reports from these places, and there's the odd comparison between the two of the three from people who've been to two. But I don't think I've ever seen anyone compare all three, has anyone been to all three? And if so how do they compare?
I imagine for someone who thinks they'll only get to do one of these types of liveaboards as a once in a lifetime trip, Galapogos would be the one to do?
I've read that Galapagos and Socorro has more variety than Cocos (which is pretty much all about sharks), and that Socorro is just as good or almost just as good as Galapagos for half the price. But that if all you care about is seeing as many sharks as possible, Cocos wins because you spend 9 days in the same spot diving with sharks everyday, whereas Galapogos you'll only spend 2 or 3 days at Wolf and Darwin.
Is that accurate? Any advice would be great!
I imagine for someone who thinks they'll only get to do one of these types of liveaboards as a once in a lifetime trip, Galapogos would be the one to do?
I've read that Galapagos and Socorro has more variety than Cocos (which is pretty much all about sharks), and that Socorro is just as good or almost just as good as Galapagos for half the price. But that if all you care about is seeing as many sharks as possible, Cocos wins because you spend 9 days in the same spot diving with sharks everyday, whereas Galapogos you'll only spend 2 or 3 days at Wolf and Darwin.
Is that accurate? Any advice would be great!