I'm starting to understand why the accidents and incidents site is so busy.
How does today's lack of gas planning help you understand a busy A and I section?
A quick look at the A and I section showed the following:
Yukon Incident.(cause not known.)
Police training exercise resulting in a death.
A health issue resulting in a death.
An exploding tank resulting in a death.
A non-disclosed issue in the Great Lakes resulting in a death.
Diver caught in rocks off Laguna resulting in a death.
Lost buddies resulting in a close call.
Elderly diver in Cayman, cause not disclosed, resulting in death.
A missing Cave Diver. Not actually a cave diver. No training. Possible hoax.
Downwelling resulting in close call in Bali.
Deniseegg's incident, health related, resulting in a close call.
Separation of a diver from a threesome in Oakland resulting in death. Dive computer showed he only used his air for 10 minutes in 60fsw. Cause not known.
It seems that few, if any of these accidents had anything to do with the gas planning/training that the victims received. The statistics don't support your assumption.
Don't get me wrong, gas planning is a key component of diving, and it surely is taught in the PADI AOW college course that I teach. (Its an 8 week long course).
On the other hand,
Boyle's Law is taught in basic OW and emphasized in the book, in the video, and by the Instructor. Paying attention to the SPG, staying close to buddy, communicating remaining air pressure, and not pushing limits are also emphasized. The result is a student who manages their gas by not letting it get too low.
Since it is recommended that new divers use 60 feet as a max depth, and it is recommended that they begin ascent with at least 800 psi, the planning is not far off average warm water Rock Bottom calculations for an AL80.
As much as I'd like to see more thorough OW training, the system seems to work.